Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 5;20(3):e0314801.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314801. eCollection 2025.

Ebola and Marburg viruses IgG detections in small ruminants and dogs from villages within outbreak areas in Gabon

Affiliations

Ebola and Marburg viruses IgG detections in small ruminants and dogs from villages within outbreak areas in Gabon

Telstar G Ndong Mebaley et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The Ebola virus (EBOV) and Marburg virus (MARV) have been in circulation in Africa for several decades and are the cause of numerous outbreaks. There has been very little research on the role of domestic animals in their transmission to humans, but studies have only been conducted in dogs and pigs where relatively high levels of IgG was detected. These levels suggest that ruminants, which have not been studied, should also be investigated. This study aims at evaluating the circulation of MARV and EBOV in dogs, sheep and goats and to assess their exposure to these two viruses. Between November 2018 and March 2023, a total of 448 domestic animal sera or plasma samples, including 128 dogs, 222 goats and 98 sheep, were analyzed by serological and molecular methods. The Luminex technique was employed for the detection of IgG antibodies against EBOV NP, GP, MARV GP and VP40, while EBOV specific and pan-filovirus polymerase chain reaction amplification was used for molecular analysis. All samples tested negative for EBOV and MARV RNA. However, our results showed that 2/128 (1.5%) dogs, 1/222 (0.4%) goats and 3/98 (3.1%) sheep displayed NP and GP anti-EBOV antibodies. In addition, 2/128 (1.5%) dogs displayed GP and VP40 anti-MARV antibodies, while no antibodies were detected in goats and sheep. Over all, these results suggest that dogs and small ruminants are naturally exposed to EBOV and MARV. In the absence of clinically sick individuals, the presence of IgG-positive animals suggests various sources of exposure, such as contaminated fruits with the urine and saliva of bats or dead bats fallen on the ground ate by dogs. These contaminated substrates are both consumed by both dogs and small ruminants. The findings provide new insights into the circulation and exposure of EBOV and MARV in domestic animals, emphasising their potential use as sentinels. Furthermore, they prompt significant considerations regarding the potential risk to humans in this region.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Location sources of outbreaks (2001-2002) and serology positive dogs in Gabon 2005.
Reprinted from [13], under a CC BY license, with permission from Eric M. Leroy, original copyright 2024.11.21. Stars indicate the location of serology positive dogs MARV 2024. Triangles indicate the location of serology positive dogs EBOV 2024. The villages where serology dogs of EBOV in 2005 were observed are indicate by  . The villages where both human cases and serology dogs of EBOV in 2005 were observed are indicate by  . The villages where human cases, infected animal carcass and serology positive dogs observed are indicate by
Fig 2
Fig 2. Location sources of outbreaks (2001-2002) and serology positive dogs in Gabon 2005.
Reprinted from [13], under a CC BY license, with permission from Eric M. Leroy, original copyright 2024.11.21. Stars indicate the location of serology positive small ruminants EBOV 2024. The villages where serology dogs of EBOV in 2005 were observed are indicate by  . The villages where both human cases and serology dogs of EBOV in 2005 were observed are indicate by  . The villages where.
Fig 3
Fig 3. IgG responses to recombinant GP and NP proteins of the Ebola virus in dogs tested with the luminex technique.
Cut-off were represented by the horizontal dotted line for each protein.
Fig 4
Fig 4. IgG responses to recombinant GP and NP proteins of the Ebola virus in small ruminants tested with the luminex technique.
Cut-off were represented by the horizontal dotted line for each protein.
Fig 5
Fig 5. IgG responses to recombinant Marburg virus GP and VP40 proteins in dogs tested using the luminex technique.
Cut-off were represented by the horizontal dotted line for each protein.

References

    1. Feldmann H, Geisbert TW. Ebola haemorrhagic fever. Lancet. 2011;377(9768):849–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60667-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leroy ÉM, Maganga GD. Diversité des modalités de transmission du virus Ébola à l’homme. Bulletin de l’Académie Vétérinaire de France. 2018;171(2):128–36. doi: 10.4267/2042/69030 - DOI
    1. Biedenkopf N, Bukreyev A, Chandran K, Di Paola N, Formenty PBH, Griffiths A, et al.. Renaming of genera Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus to Orthoebolavirus and Orthomarburgvirus, respectively, and introduction of binomial species names within family Filoviridae. Arch Virol. 2023;168(8):220. doi: 10.1007/s00705-023-05834-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pourrut X, Kumulungui B, Wittmann T, Moussavou G, Délicat A, Yaba P, et al.. The natural history of Ebola virus in Africa. Microbes Infect. 2005;7(7–8):1005–14. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.04.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leroy EM, Rouquet P, Formenty P, Souquière S, Kilbourne A, Froment J-M, et al.. Multiple Ebola virus transmission events and rapid decline of central African wildlife. Science. 2004;303(5656):387–90. doi: 10.1126/science.1092528 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms