Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e088869.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088869.

Long-term safety and efficacy of anti-GM-CSF otilimab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: long-term extension of three phase 3 randomised trials (contRAst X)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Long-term safety and efficacy of anti-GM-CSF otilimab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: long-term extension of three phase 3 randomised trials (contRAst X)

Michael E Weinblatt et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of otilimab, an antigranulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor monoclonal antibody, for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods: ContRAst X (NCT04333147) was a phase 3, multicentre, long-term extension trial. Patients with RA aged ≥18 years who completed a qualifying contRAst trial (contRAst 1-3) and who the investigator thought might benefit from long-term otilimab treatment were eligible to enter contRAst X. Patients who received otilimab (90 mg/150 mg) in their qualifying trial maintained the same dose; patients who received tofacitinib or sarilumab were rerandomised 1:1 to either otilimab dose. Patients could continue background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The primary objective was long-term safety (up to 4 years).

Results: Of the 2916 patients who entered contRAst X, 2915 received otilimab (exposure range: 7-896 days); the majority were withdrawn due to early trial termination. For otilimab 90 mg and 150 mg, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 62% (n=902/1456) and 64% (n=931/1459), the incidence of AEs of special interest was 8% (n=120/1456) and 7% (n=95/1459) and the incidence of serious AEs was 8% (n=123/1456) and 8% (n=114/1459), respectively. There were no instances of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP), active tuberculosis (TB), TB reactivation or serious hypersensitivity reactions. The proportions of clinical disease activity index low disease activity responders remained relatively stable throughout, with no apparent reduction following the switch from tofacitinib/sarilumab to otilimab.

Conclusion: No new safety signals or instances of PAP were associated with long-term (≤2.5 years) treatment with otilimab.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04333147.

Keywords: Clinical Trial; RHEUMATOLOGY; THERAPEUTICS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MEW receives research support from AbbVie, Aqtual, Bristol Myers Squibb and Lilly and consultation fees from AbbVie, Aclaris, Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, CorEvitas, Genosco, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Horizon, Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Rami Therapeutics, R Pharma, Roche, Sanofi, Scipher, Sci Rhom, Set Point and Tremeau. He holds stock/stock options in CanFite, Inmedix and Scipher. PCT has received consulting fees from AbbVie, AnaptysBio, Acelyrin, Biogen, Immunovant, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and UCB and research support from Galapagos. IBMcI has received consultancy and research support from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Causeway, Compugen, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB and holds a leadership role in the University of Glasgow, Versus Arthritis and is an NHS GGC Board Member and an Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Editorial Board Member. TA has accepted research grants and/or honoraria for meetings from AbbVie, Alexion, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Lilly Japan, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical and UCB Japan. VS has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Alpine, Alumis, Amgen, Aria, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Ermium, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Horizon, Inmedix, Janssen, Kiniksa, Lilly, Merck, MiMedx, Novartis, Omeros, Pfizer, R-Pharm, RAPT, Regeneron, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Scipher, Setpoint, Sorrento, Spherix, Tonix and Urica. TT received payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Lilly Japan, Mitsubishi-Tanabe and Pfizer Japan and is an Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Editorial Board Member. MB, DB, PC, AG, RN, CO’S, DS, CS, MW and RW are employees of GSK and hold GSK stock/shares. KR is an employee of Probabilitas Consulting Limited and is contracted by GSK. RMF has received research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Arthrosi, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galvani, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Priovant, Samsung, Sanofi-Genzyme, Selecta and UCB; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arthrosi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cyxone, Dren Bio, Galapagos, Galvani, Gilead, GSK, Immunovant, ImmuneMed, InventisBio, Janssen, Kiniksa, Lilly, Monte Rosa, Novartis, Pfizer, Priovant, Recor, Samsung, Synact, UCB and VYNE and is an Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Editorial Board Member.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Patient disposition. Figure indicates the number of patients who enrolled in contRAst X from each of the qualifying trials (contRAst 1, contRAst 2 or contRAst 3) and the total number enrolled. Green boxes indicate the treatment arm of the qualifying trial that patients were enrolled on. Blue boxes indicate the safety and intent-to-treat (ITT) populations of contRAst X, stratified by prior treatment in the qualifying trial. *Patients who received otilimab in their qualifying trial were assigned to the same dose in contRAst X. Patients who received an active comparator (tofacitinib or sarilumab) were rerandomised 1:1 to either otilimab dose. One patient was randomised to the otilimab 150 mg arm but was withdrawn due to a physician decision before receiving any dose, and this patient was excluded from the safety and ITT populations. §One death due to septic shock occurred after the safety follow-up visit (starting 64 days and resulting in death 65 days after the last dose) and thus was not considered treatment emergent.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Proportion of patients with CDAI low, moderate and high disease activity with (A) otilimab 90 mg and (B) otilimab 150 mg (posthoc analysis). C1, contRAst 1; C2, contRAst 2; C3, contRAst 3; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index.

References

    1. Burmester GR, Weinblatt ME, McInnes IB, et al. Efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1445–52. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202450. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell IK, Rich MJ, Bischof RJ, et al. Protection from collagen-induced arthritis in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-deficient mice. J Immunol. 1998;161:3639–44. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.161.7.3639. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greven DEA, Cohen ES, Gerlag DM, et al. Preclinical characterisation of the GM-CSF receptor as a therapeutic target in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:1924–30. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205234. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamilton JA. GM-CSF in inflammation. J Exp Med. 2020;217:e20190945. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190945. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lotfi N, Thome R, Rezaei N, et al. Roles of GM-CSF in the Pathogenesis of Autoimmune Diseases: An Update. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1265. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01265. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data