Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;7(3):219-230.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2025.01.012. Epub 2025 Mar 4.

Cardiac Effects of Modern Breast Radiation Therapy in Patients Receiving Systemic Cancer Therapy

Affiliations

Cardiac Effects of Modern Breast Radiation Therapy in Patients Receiving Systemic Cancer Therapy

Eva Berlin et al. JACC CardioOncol. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Radiation therapy (RT) improves breast cancer outcomes, but cardiac morbidity remains a concern.

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate changes in cardiac function after RT and the relationship between cardiac dose metrics and echocardiography-derived measures of function.

Methods: In a longitudinal cohort study of women with breast cancer, radiation cardiac dose metrics and core lab quantitated echocardiographic measures of cardiac function were evaluated. Dose metrics included the whole heart, left ventricle, right ventricle, and left anterior descending artery (LAD). Echocardiographic measures included left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), longitudinal strain, circumferential strain, E/e' (ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annular tissue velocity), Ea/Es (ventricular arterial coupling; ratio of effective arterial elastance to end systolic elastance), and right ventricular fractional area change. The mean change in echocardiographic measures over time and the association between cardiac dose metrics and echocardiographic measures were estimated by repeated-measures multivariable linear regression via generalized estimating equations.

Results: The cohort included 303 participants (median age 52 years, 33.3% African American) who received adjuvant RT (2010-2019) with a median mean heart dose of 1.19 Gy (Q1-Q3: 0.75-2.61 Gy), were followed over a median of 5.1 years (Q1-Q3: 3.2-7.1 years). Across all participants, there was a modest increase in LVEF (52.1% pre-RT to 54.3% at 5 years; P < 0.001) but a worsening in sensitive measures of function, such as circumferential strain (-23.7% pre-RT to -21.0% at 5 years; P = 0.003). Among left-sided/bilateral breast cancer participants, changes in cardiac function were observed across all parameters (P < 0.05). The maximum LAD dose was associated with a modest worsening in LVEF, longitudinal strain, circumferential strain, and E/e'.

Conclusions: Over a median of 5.1 years, modest changes in cardiac function were observed with RT. Maximum LAD dose was associated with a worsening in systolic and diastolic function parameters.

Keywords: breast cancer; cardiac toxicity; cardio-oncology; cardiotoxicity; diastolic function; echocardiography; heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; radiation cardiotoxicity; radiation physics; radiation therapy; ventricular-arterial coupling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by funding and support from the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers R01HL118018, R21 HL-157886, and K24HL167127-01A1 to Dr Ky); and the American Heart Association AHA Strategically Focused Research Network Award in Cardio-Oncology to Dr Ky, and Abramson Cancer Center Pilot Grant to Drs Ky and Freedman. Dr Taunk has received grant support from Varian Medical Systems and TheraPanacea; served as a consultant for Boston Scientific and Point Biopharma; received honoraria from GenMab and Boston Scientific; and served on the advisory board for Boston Scientific, Point Biopharma, and Varian Medical Systems. Dr Narayan has served as a consultant for Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Regeneron, Astellas, Merck, Xencor, Myovant, Sanofi, Exelixis, and Eisai; and received institutional research funding from Pfizer, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol Myers Squibb, Regeneron, and Xencor. Dr Clark has received grant support from Lilly. Dr Shah has served as a consultant for Gilead Sciences, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Biotheranostics. Dr Ky has received grant support from Pfizer; honoraria from UpToDate and the American College of Cardiology; and has provided service as the echo core lab (no direct compensation) for Impulse Dynamics. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Central Illustration
Central Illustration
Change in Echocardiogram Parameters Over Time in the Entire Cohort Plots correspond to the predicted mean change in echocardiogram parameter over time from baseline (time = 0, pre–radiation therapy [pre-RT]) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years and were estimated by repeated-measures linear regression via generalized estimating equations. The model was adjusted for the following covariates: age, cancer stage (1 and 2 vs 3 and 4), body mass index, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, race, baseline hypertension, baseline diabetes, baseline cardioprotective medications (beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statins), time since last chemotherapy exposure to start of radiation, systemic cancer therapy (anthracycline, trastuzumab, anthracycline + trastuzumab), time since initiation of radiation, treatment site (left/bilateral vs right), and baseline echocardiographic measure of interest. Lines within bars represent 95% CIs. Along the y-axis, a bold red arrow is placed to indicate the directionality of a detriment in cardiovascular function relative to baseline. The x-axis represents the years since radiation therapy initiation. E = early diastolic mitral inflow velocity; e′ = early diastolic mitral annular tissue velocity; Ea = systemic arterial load; Ees = left ventricular contractile function; FAC = fractional area change; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; RT = radiation therapy; VA = ventricular-arterial.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Change in Echocardiogram Parameters Over Time, by Treatment Site Plots are stratified by treatment sites bilateral or left chest wall (orange) and right breast or chest wall only (green) and correspond to the predicted mean change in echocardiogram parameter over time from baseline (time = 0, pre–radiation therapy [pre-RT]) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years and were estimated by repeated-measures linear regression via generalized estimating equations. The model was adjusted for the following covariates: age, cancer stage (1 and 2 vs 3 and 4), body mass index, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, race, baseline hypertension, baseline diabetes, baseline cardioprotective medications (beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, statins), time since last chemotherapy exposure to start of radiation, systemic cancer therapy (anthracycline, trastuzumab, anthracycline + trastuzumab), treatment site (left/bilateral, right), time since initiation of radiation, and baseline echocardiographic measure of interest. Lines within bars represent 95% CIs. E = peak early diastolic transmitral blood flow; e′ = peak early mitral annular tissue velocity; Ea = systemic arterial load; Ees = left ventricular contractile function; FAC = fractional area change; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction.

References

    1. Darby S.C., McGale P., Taylor C.W., Peto R. Long-term mortality from heart disease and lung cancer after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: prospective cohort study of about 300 000 women in US SEER cancer registries. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(8):557–565. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70251-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greenlee H., Iribarren C., Rana J.S., et al. Risk of cardiovascular disease in women with and without breast cancer: the Pathways Heart Study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(15):1647–1658. doi: 10.1200/jco.21.01736. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Darby S.C., Ewertz M., McGale P., et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(11):987–998. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209825. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ng A.C.T., Dong X., Sharma H., et al. Deep inspiration breath hold and global longitudinal strain in women undergoing left-sided breast irradiation. JACC CardioOncol. 2022;4(1):136–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.01.093. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duma M.N., Baumann R., Budach W., et al. Heart-sparing radiotherapy techniques in breast cancer patients: a recommendation of the breast cancer expert panel of the German society of radiation oncology (DEGRO) Strahlenther Onkol. 2019;195(10):861–871. doi: 10.1007/s00066-019-01495-w. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources