Can we avoid casting for suspected scaphoid fractures? A multicenter randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 40044935
- PMCID: PMC11883040
- DOI: 10.1186/s10195-025-00822-5
Can we avoid casting for suspected scaphoid fractures? A multicenter randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: In suspected scaphoid fractures with normal initial radiographs, the usual care is casting, but only 10% of patients have scaphoid fractures. To reduce overtreatment, we evaluated whether bandaging, instead of casting, resulted in noninferior functional outcomes.
Patients and methods: We included adults with suspected scaphoid fractures and normal initial radiographs at the emergency department in our multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to 3-day bandaging or 2-week casting. Questionnaires, physical examination, and radiographs were performed at 2 weeks and 1 year. Additional questionnaires were sent after inclusion, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Our primary outcome was the adjusted estimated difference between groups of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH) score at 3 months (natural logarithm of the margin of noninferiority = 2.0). Secondary outcomes included the QDASH score, Patient-Rated Hand/Wrist Evaluation Score, visual analog scale pain, wrist range of motion, patient satisfaction, and complications during follow-up.
Results: Of the 180 patients (91 bandaging and 89 casting), 16 had scaphoid fractures and there were no scaphoid nonunions. Functional outcome in the bandaging group was noninferior at 3 months compared with the casting group [adjusted estimated difference QDASH score 0.30 (95% CI 0.02-0.62)]. All other patient-reported function and pain scores were not significantly different between groups. Range of motion at 2 weeks was better in the bandaging group, and they were more satisfied with the treatment than the casting group.
Conclusions: Casting for suspected scaphoid fractures but normal initial radiographs can be avoided because bandaging seems to be an alternative treatment option when patients are reevaluated after 2 weeks. Level of evidence Level II. Trial registration Trial registered at the Trialregister on 2018-02-28 on www.trialregister.nl , NTR7164.
Keywords: Adults; Bone; Fractures; Patient-reported outcome measures; Scaphoid bone; Wrist injuries.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The medical ethics committee of the Erasmus MC University Medical Center approved the study protocol prior to study commencement and all subsequent amendments (MEC-2017-504). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- de Zwart AD, Beeres FJ, Rhemrev SJ et al (2016) Comparison of MRI, CT and bone scintigraphy for suspected scaphoid fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 42:725–731 - PubMed
-
- Clementson M, Thomsen N, Jørgsholm P et al (2016) Is early mobilisation better than immobilisation in the treatment of wrist sprains? J Plast Surg Hand Surg 50:156–160 - PubMed
-
- Holloway KL, Moloney DJ, Brennan-Olsen SL et al (2015) Carpal and scaphoid fracture incidence in south-eastern Australia: an epidemiologic study. Arch Osteoporos 10:10 - PubMed
-
- Stirling PHC, Strelzow JA, Doornberg JN et al (2021) Diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures. JBJS Rev 9(e20):00247 - PubMed
-
- Reigstad O, Grimsgaard C, Thorkildsen R et al (2012) Scaphoid non-unions, where do they come from? The epidemiology and initial presentation of 270 scaphoid non-unions. Hand Surg 17:331–335 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical