Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 5;25(1):342.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12494-2.

Impact of hospital and health system initiatives to address Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) in the United States: a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature

Affiliations

Impact of hospital and health system initiatives to address Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) in the United States: a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature

Pavani Rangachari et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Hospital and health system initiatives addressing Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) are essential for achieving whole-person care and advancing health equity. Building on prior research characterizing these efforts (Part 1), this scoping review (Part 2) evaluates the effectiveness of these initiatives, with a focus on SDOH data integration, EHR utilization, and the broader scope of hospital efforts in addressing individual- and system-level determinants of health. Using an integrated conceptual framework combining the DeVoe & Cottrell framework for operational assessment and the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) 5A framework for systemic evaluation, this study provides a multidimensional assessment of hospital-based SDOH interventions.

Methods: Guided by PRISMA-ScR criteria, this review analyzed 41 U.S.-based studies published between 2018 and 2023, identified through three academic databases. Eligible studies examined hospital initiatives addressing SDOH with measurable outcomes. Analyses assessed SDOH data collection, integration into care practices, EHR use, and overall initiative effectiveness.

Results: Most studies (66%) were randomized controlled trials in urban settings (68%), targeting patients with chronic or mental health conditions (39%) or high-risk healthcare users (20%). Nearly half of initiatives (49%) addressed multiple SDOH domains, focusing on Social & Community Context, Economic Stability, and Neighborhood & Built Environment. Only 24% of initiatives utilized EHRs for SDOH data collection. EHR-based initiatives demonstrated significantly higher adherence to evidence-based practices, including use of community resource guides for referrals (90% vs. 45%, p = 0.013). Across all outcome measures, 79% demonstrated improvement, with no instances of worsening outcomes. However, 85% of initiatives lacked community-level SDOH data integration, and few employed upstream, universal strategies. Process, clinical, and social outcomes were unevenly prioritized, with only 10% of studies addressing all three outcome types.

Conclusions: While these initiatives reflect progress in integrating SDOH into care workflows and improving whole-person care at the individual level, progress toward health equity remains insufficient. Persistent gaps in EHR use, community-level data integration, and upstream strategies hinder systemic impact, potentially perpetuating disparities. Strengthening SDOH-EHR integration, fostering community partnerships, and supporting policy advocacy are critical to bridging individual and community needs. Future research should emphasize long-term, sustainable, and community-level impacts of hospital-led SDOH interventions.

Keywords: Electronic health records; Health equity; Health-related social needs; Hospitals and health systems; Population health; Quintuple aim; Social determinants of health; Whole person care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Are not applicable to this scoping review of the literature. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Integrating the NAM 5A and DeVoe & Cottrell frameworks for evaluating hospital-led SDOH initiatives
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PRISMA flow chart for article selection
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Impact of hospital and health system SDOH initiatives on outcomes

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Solomon LS, Kanter MH. Health Care Steps Up to Social Determinants of Health: Current Context. Perm J. 2018;22:18–139. 10.7812/TPP/18-139. PMCID: PMC6207436.
    1. Hilts KE, Yeager VA, Gibson PJ, Halverson PK, Blackburn J, Menachemi N. Hospital partnerships for population health: A systematic review of the literature. J Healthc Manag. 2021;66(3):170–98. 10.1097/JHM-D-20-00172. PMID: 33960964; PMCID: PMC8323487. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, Farley K, Wright K. Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e013384. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013384. PMID: 28389486; PMCID: PMC5558801. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galea S, Tracy M, Hoggatt KJ, Dimaggio C, Karpati A. Estimated deaths attributable to social factors in the united States. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(8):1456–65. 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300086. Epub 2011 Jun 16. PMID: 21680937; PMCID: PMC3134519. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hood CM, Gennuso KP, Swain GR, et al. County health rankings: relationships between determinant factors and health outcomes. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(2):129–35. 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.024. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources