The Acute Effects of Antagonist Static Stretching on Agonist Performance
- PMID: 40046219
- PMCID: PMC11877292
- DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2025.93
The Acute Effects of Antagonist Static Stretching on Agonist Performance
Abstract
Stretching the antagonist muscle to enhance agonist performance has gained considerable attention. However, most studies have focused on one stretching duration. Hence, the aim of this study was to compare varying durations (40-, 80-, and 120-seconds) of antagonist (dorsiflexors) static stretching (SS) on agonist (plantar flexors: PF) muscle performance. In this randomized crossover study, 16 participants (six females) underwent four sessions (40-, 80-, 120-s dorsiflexors SS and control), with pre- and post-intervention measurements of slow (600/s) and fast (2400/s) PF isokinetic, isometric peak torque, total work, stiff leg drop jump (SDJ) performance (height, reactive strength index (RSI) and peak power), and tibialis anterior and soleus electromyography (EMG). Dorsiflexors SS protocol involved 1x40-s (40-s), 2x40-s (80-s), and 3x40-s (120-s). There were no significant pre- to post-intervention changes in any parameter. A main effect for time demonstrated an overall decrease in fast (p < 0.0001, 5.9%, d = 0.24) and slow (p = 0.05, 6.6%, d = 0.24) isokinetic peak torque, total work (p = 0.02, 5.1%, d = 0.20) and all SDJ measures (SDJ height: p = 0.02, 2.7%, d = 0.15, RSI: p < 0.0001, 5.9%, d = 0.23, peak power: p = 0.002, 4.4%, d = 0.22). Soleus EMG decreased from pre- to post-SS after 120-s in both isometric (p = 0.002, 13.6%, d = 0.73) and slow isokinetic (p = 0.002, 12.3%, d = 0.91) peak torque as well as 80-s with slow isokinetic peak torque (p = 0.02, 6.6%, d = 0.75). In summary, different durations of dorsiflexors SS (40-s, 80-s, 120-s) did not significantly influence PF performance. However, deficits associated with a main effect for time suggested possible testing effects as detected with the control condition.
Keywords: Co-contractions; co-activation; dorsiflexors; electromyography; peak torque; plantar flexors.
© Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.
Figures



References
-
- Baratta R., Solomonow M., Zhou B.H., Letson D., Chuinard R., D'Ambrosia R. (1988) Muscular coactivation. The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. American Journal of Sports Medicine 16, 113-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658801600205 10.1177/036354658801600205 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Behm D.G. (2018) The Science And Physiology Of Flexibility And Stretching: Implications And Applications In Sport Performance And Health. Routledge Publishers (UK). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110745 10.4324/9781315110745 - DOI
-
- Behm D.G., Alizadeh S., Daneshjoo A., Anvar S.H., Graham A., Zahiri A., Goudini R., Edwards C., Culleton R., Scharf C., Konrad A. (2023) Acute effects of various stretching techniques on range of motion: a systematic review with meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine Open 9, 107. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-023-00652-x 10.1186/s40798-023-00652-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Behm D.G., Blazevich A.J., Kay A.D., McHugh M. (2016) Acute effects of muscle stretching on physical performance, range of motion, and injury incidence in healthy active individuals: a systematic review. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 41, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0235 10.1139/apnm-2015-0235 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Behm D.G., Button D.C., Butt J.C. (2001) Factors affecting force loss with prolonged stretching. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology 26, 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1139/h01-017 10.1139/h01-017 - DOI - PubMed