Changes in V̇O 2max after 6 wk of Intensity Domain-Specific Training: Role of Central and Peripheral Adaptations
- PMID: 40047443
- DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003697
Changes in V̇O 2max after 6 wk of Intensity Domain-Specific Training: Role of Central and Peripheral Adaptations
Abstract
Purpose: This study characterized central and peripheral adaptations to domain-specific endurance exercise training.
Methods: Eighty-four young healthy participants were randomly assigned to age- and sex-matched groups of: continuous cycling in the 1) moderate-intensity (MOD), 2) lower heavy-intensity (HVY1), and 3) upper heavy-intensity (HVY2) domain; interval cycling in the 4) severe-intensity domain (i.e., high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and 5) extreme-intensity domain (i.e., sprint-interval training (SIT)); or 6) control (CON). Two 3-wk phases of training (three sessions per week) were performed. All training protocols, except SIT, were work matched.
Results: Maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O 2max ), maximal cardiac output (Q˙ max ), derived maximal arterial-venous oxygen difference (a-vO 2diff ), blood volume (BV), plasma volume (PV), and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-derived muscle oxidative capacity (τOxCap) were measured and compared at PRE and POST. The largest change in V̇O 2max occurred in HIIT (0.43 ± 0.20 L·min -1 ), which was greater than CON (0.02 ± 0.08 L·min -1 ), MOD (0.11 ± 0.19 L·min -1 ), HVY1 (0.24 ± 0.18 L·min -1 ), and SIT (0.28 ± 0.21 L·min -1 ) ( P < 0.05) but not HVY2 (0.36 ± 0.14 L·min -1 ) ( P > 0.05). Changes in Q˙ max were observed in HVY1 (1.6 ± 0.5 L·min -1 ), HVY2 (3.0 ± 0.6 L·min -1 ), HIIT (2.9 ± 1.2 L·min -1 ), and SIT (1.8 ± 1.4 L·min -1 ) ( P < 0.05) but not in MOD (1.2 ± 0.3 L·min -1 ) and CON (0.1 ± -0.5 L·min -1 ) ( P > 0.05). HVY2 and HIIT produced significant changes in BV (438 ± 101 and 302 ± 38 mL) and PV (198 ± 92 and 158 ± 51 mL), respectively ( P < 0.05), whereas other groups did not.
Conclusions: No significant peripheral adaptations (i.e., τOxCap and a-vO 2diff ) were observed in any group ( P > 0.05). The results indicate that higher training intensities (i.e., HVY2 and HIIT) produce larger changes in V̇O 2max , which is supported predominantly by central adaptations. In addition, results suggest that, despite nonsignificant changes, the contribution of peripheral components to changes in V̇O 2max should not be dismissed.
Keywords: CARDIOVASCULAR EXERCISE; CYCLING TRAINING; ENDURANCE; MECHANISMS.
Copyright © 2025 by the American College of Sports Medicine.
References
-
- Astorino TA, Edmunds RM, Clark A, et al. High-intensity interval training increases cardiac output and VO 2max . Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2017;49(2):265–73.
-
- Daussin FN, Ponsot E, Dufour SP, et al. Improvement of V̇O 2max by cardiac output and oxygen extraction adaptation during intermittent versus continuous endurance training. Eur J Appl Physiol . 2007;101(3):377–83.
-
- Montero D, Cathomen A, Jacobs RA, et al. Haematological rather than skeletal muscle adaptations contribute to the increase in peak oxygen uptake induced by moderate endurance training. J Physiol . 2015;593(20):4677–88.
-
- Murias JM, Kowalchuk JM, Paterson DH. Mechanisms for increases in VO 2max with endurance training in older and young women. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2010;42(10):1891–8.
-
- Helgerud J, Høydal K, Wang E, et al. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve V̇O 2max more than moderate training. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2007;39(4):665–71.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
