Perceived Impact on Patient Routines/Responsibilities for Surgery and a Nonsurgical Primary Treatment Option in Recurrent Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Findings From the ENVISION Phase 3 Trial
- PMID: 40048558
- DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004511
Perceived Impact on Patient Routines/Responsibilities for Surgery and a Nonsurgical Primary Treatment Option in Recurrent Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Findings From the ENVISION Phase 3 Trial
Erratum in
-
Perceived Impact on Patient Routines/Responsibilities for Surgery and a Nonsurgical Primary Treatment Option in Recurrent Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Findings From the ENVISION Phase 3 Trial: Erratum.J Urol. 2025 Dec;214(6):674. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004745. Epub 2025 Nov 7. J Urol. 2025. PMID: 41200996 No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: Adults with low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer commonly ask urologists how their routine/responsibilities will be affected by treatments, including the standard of care, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). We asked patients in the ENVISION trial to compare TURBT with a nonsurgical primary treatment (UGN-102 containing mitomycin) for acceptability and impact on their routine/responsibilities.
Materials and methods: ENVISION is a phase 3, single-arm trial where UGN-102 was administered as 6 weekly intravesical instillations. Interviews with US patients were conducted at enrollment (before instillations) and 3 months (primary trial end point). Transcripts were coded by 3 coders using the gold standard of content analysis to derive interview themes.
Results: Forty-one US patients from 31 sites were eligible, and 29 of 41 completed both interviews. Most of the participating patients were male (62%), White (83%), and of age 65+ years (69%). Three themes were derived: (1) Patients perceived that TURBT interfered more with their routine/responsibilities. (2) Urinary symptoms were perceived to be similar, but bleeding, catheter issues, and time to resuming sexual activity lasted longer with TURBT. For UGN-102, uncommon reports were internal itching and difficulty keeping gel in the bladder during instillations. (3) Patients would recommend UGN-102 to other patients because it was perceived to be less invasive, painful, and time-consuming than TURBT.
Conclusions: Patients perceived UGN-102 to be a favorable primary treatment alternative to traditional surgical resections for low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. By focusing on the underexplored area of patient perceptions, this study provides key information urologists will need to conduct shared decision-making conversations.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05243550.
Keywords: NMIBC neoplasms; clinical trial; drug-related side effects; intravesical; urinary bladder diseases.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2025 Jul;214(1):30-31. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004529. Epub 2025 Mar 27. J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40145467 No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2025 Jul;214(1):31. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004550. Epub 2025 Apr 8. J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40197089 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
