Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun:81:104432.
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104432. Epub 2025 Mar 1.

A composite 18F-FDG PET/CT and HER2 tissue-based biomarker to predict response to neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer (TBCRC026)

Affiliations

A composite 18F-FDG PET/CT and HER2 tissue-based biomarker to predict response to neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer (TBCRC026)

Maeve A Hennessy et al. Breast. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Early metabolic change on PET/CT was predictive of response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HP) in TBCRC026. We hypothesized that a composite biomarker incorporating PET/CT and HER2 tissue-based biomarkers could improve biomarker performance.

Methods: 83 patients with estrogen receptor-negative/HER2-positive breast cancer received neoadjuvant HP alone [pathologic complete response (pCR) 22 %]. PET/CT was performed at baseline and 15 days post initiation of therapy (C1D15). Promising imaging biomarkers included ≥40 % SULmax decline between baseline and C1D15, and C1D15 SULmax ≤3. Baseline tissue-based biomarkers included HER2-enriched intrinsic subtype (72 %, 46/64; NanoString), tumor HER2 protein abundance (median log2 13.5, range log2 7.1-15.9; NanoString DSP), and HER2 3+ (83 %, 64/77; immunohistochemistry). Logistic regressions were fitted to predict pCR with HER2/PET-CT biomarkers. The C statistic assessed overall prediction power. The optimal composite score cut-off was determined by maximizing Youden's index.

Results: Factors most predictive for pCR in single predictor models included C1D15 SULmax (OR 0.43; p = 0.007, c = 0.77), % reduction in SULmax (OR 1.03, p = 0.006, c = 0.72) and tumor HER2 protein abundance (OR 1.75; p = 0.01, c = 0.76). The composite of C1D15 SULmax and % reduction in SULmax and their interaction term, had improved probability (c = 0.89 from c = 0.78), with high sensitivity (100 %) and negative predictive value (100 %). The addition of tumor HER2 protein did not further improve prediction power (c = 0.90).

Conclusion: The HER2/PET-CT biomarker had high prediction power for pCR, however was not superior to the prediction power of PET/CT alone. Non-invasive PET/CT biomarkers may facilitate a response-guided approach to neoadjuvant therapy, allowing intensification and de-intensification of treatment, pending further evaluation.

Keywords: (18)F-FDG PET/CT; Breast cancer; HER2-Biomarkers; Neoadjuvant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Receiver Operating Characteristic curve for C1D15 SULmax. Abbreviations: AUC: Area Under the Curve, NPV: Negative Predictive Value, PPV: Positive Predicitive Value.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiver Operating Characteristic curve for the composite of D15SULmax and Log 2 HER2 tumor protein abundance. Abbreviations: AUC: Area Under the Curve, NPV: Negative Predictive Value, PPV: Positive Predicitive Value.
Fig. 3A
Fig. 3A
Receiver Operating Characteristic curve for the composite of D15 SULmax and % reduction in SULmax. Abbreviations: AUC: Area Under the Curve, NPV: Negative Predictive Value, PPV: Positive Predicitive Value.
Fig. 3B
Fig. 3B
Receiver Operating Characteristic curve for the composite of D15 SULmax and % reduction in SULmax including interaction term. Abbreviations: AUC: Area Under the Curve, NPV: Negative Predictive Value, PPV: Positive Predicitive Value.

References

    1. Gianni L., Pienkowski T., Im Y.H., et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):25–32. - PubMed
    1. Schneeweiss A., Chia S., Hickish T., et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA) Ann Oncol. 2013;24(9):2278–2284. - PubMed
    1. Prat A., Carey L.A., Adamo B., et al. Molecular features and survival outcomes of the intrinsic subtypes within HER2-positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(8) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schettini F., Pascual T., Conte B., et al. HER2-enriched subtype and pathological complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020;84 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carey L.A., Berry D.A., Cirrincione C.T., et al. Molecular heterogeneity and response to neoadjuvant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeting in CALGB 40601, a randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab with or without lapatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):542–549. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms