Active surveillance of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2: 2025 British Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology consensus statement
- PMID: 40049205
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00524-2
Active surveillance of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2: 2025 British Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology consensus statement
Abstract
Histological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) has traditionally been the cutoff for local surgical treatment, due to a substantial risk of cancer development. However, evidence from the past decade suggests 50-60% of CIN2 lesions spontaneously regress, and active surveillance (or conservative management-ie, leaving the lesion untreated) might be justified in some cases. Active surveillance of CIN2 lesions is now practised widely, although clear recommendations on eligibility, frequency of surveillance, threshold for treatment, and criteria for return to routine recall are insufficient in most countries. In 2023, the cumulative risk of invasive cancer over 20 years was found to be substantially higher in patients under active surveillance when compared with patients who received immediate local treatment, with the greatest difference observed in women older than 30 years. This Policy Review and practice algorithm from the British Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and the European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology prevention committees aims to review existing evidence and present clear recommendations to assist clinical decision making. Active surveillance, rather than immediate treatment, might be reasonable in a carefully selected cohort of patients. The risk of progression, need for repeat visits, and cumulative risk of future invasion associated with active surveillance should be carefully balanced against the benefits of awaiting regression, including consideration of the woman's age, fertility wishes, additional risk factors, and likelihood of compliance to follow-up. Clinical audit and, ideally, prospective databases are required to monitor long-term outcomes and safety.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests MK received funding from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology for this work. MK received honoraria from Hologic unrelated to this work. SJB has received funding from the National Institute of Health and Care Research and a Wellcome Trust Clinician Scientist 4i Fellowship, unrelated to this work. AH has received an honorarium from Exeltis and equipment from Roche Diagnostics, unrelated to this work. DL is the president of the British Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. TF-W has received travel funding from the Chinese Colposcopy Society, unrelated to this work, and she is the past president of the British Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology and president elect of the International Federation for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. IK has received funding from the Finnish Research Council, Finnish Medical Foundation, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and Finnish State Research Funding, unrelated to this work. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
