Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 6;15(3):e093409.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093409.

CADOR (Capsaicin in neuropathic-like pain in digital osteoarthritis) study protocol: a multicentre randomised parallel-group trial

Affiliations

CADOR (Capsaicin in neuropathic-like pain in digital osteoarthritis) study protocol: a multicentre randomised parallel-group trial

Angelique Fan et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: It is common for finger pain in hand osteoarthritis (HOA) to display a neuropathic component. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and conventional analgesics are not very effective in relieving this neuropathic-like pain. Capsaicin, a compound extracted from chilli peppers, is approved for the management of localised neuropathic pain. However, the effectiveness of an 8% capsaicin transdermal patch has never been tested in HOA patients with neuropathic-like pain in a randomised setting. In this study, we aimed to compare the 60-day (D60) efficacy of a transdermal application of capsaicin 8% versus a control (very low-dose capsaicin at 0.04%) on hand pain in patients with painful digital osteoarthritis with a neuropathic-like pain component.

Methods and analysis: CADOR (CApsaicin in neuropathic-like pain in Digital Osteoarthritis: a Randomised trial) is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind, two parallel group, phase 3 clinical trial. Eligible patients have HOA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria and at least Kellgren-Lawrence grade≥2, with neuropathic-like pain ('Douleur neuropathique en 4 questions' (DN4) score≥4/10 and pain intensity≥40/100 mm). At Day 0, 120 patients will be randomised (1:1) to receive a single 30 min topical application of either capsaicin 8% transdermal patch (experimental group) or capsaicin 0.04% transdermal patch (control group). The primary outcome is pain intensity in the fingers over the past 48 hours at Day 60, measured with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 mm. Secondary outcomes are functional disability, quality of life, anxiety and depression, the patient's global impression of improvement, use of analgesics and NSAIDs and the safety of capsaicin. At visit D60, patients who still have finger pain≥40/100 mm on the VAS will receive, if they wish a single 30 min topical application of capsaicin 8% transdermal patch (not blinded). The efficacy of two transdermal applications of capsaicin (either two applications of 8% patch in the experimental arm or one application of 0.04% and one application of 8% in the control arm) will be assessed on Day 120.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained from the French Health Authorities (Comité de protection des Personnes SUD EST V and Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament) on 23 May 2024 in accordance with European Regulation n°536/2014 of 16 April 2014 (ref: 2024-511159-16-00) before participant enrolment.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06444919.

Keywords: Chronic Pain; Neurological pain; RHEUMATOLOGY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The planned flow chart of the multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind, two parallel group, CADOR study. CADOR, CApsaicin in neuropathic-like pain in digital osteoarthritis: a randomised trial; mm, millimetres; n, number of patients; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale.

References

    1. Steinmetz JD, Culbreth GT, Haile LM. Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990-2020 and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;5:e508–22. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00163-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sellam J. De l’arthrose aux arthroses : une nouvelle vision phy-siopathologique. Bulletin de l’Académie Nationale de Médecine. 2018;202:139–52. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4079(19)30347-4. - DOI
    1. French HP, Smart KM, Doyle F. Prevalence of neuropathic pain in knee or hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;47:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.02.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Favero M, Cacciavillani M, Ometto F, et al. Assessment of Neuropathic Pain in Erosive Hand Osteoarthritis. J Clin Med. 2024;13:3244. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113244. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moisset X, Pagé MG, Pereira B, et al. Pharmacological treatments of neuropathic pain: real-life comparisons using propensity score matching. Pain. 2022;163:964–74. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002461. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data