Detecting and responding to deterioration of a baby during labour: surveys of maternity professionals to inform co-design and implementation of a new standardised approach
- PMID: 40050068
- PMCID: PMC11887309
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084578
Detecting and responding to deterioration of a baby during labour: surveys of maternity professionals to inform co-design and implementation of a new standardised approach
Abstract
Objectives: Detecting and responding to deterioration of a baby during labour is likely to benefit from a standardised approach supported by principles of track-and-trigger systems. To inform co-design of a standardised approach and associated implementation strategies, we sought the views of UK-based maternity professionals.
Design: Two successive cross-sectional surveys were hosted on an online collaboration platform (Thiscovery) between July 2021 and April 2022.
Setting: UK.
Participants: Across both surveys, 765 UK-based maternity professionals.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: Count and percentage of participants selecting closed-ended response options, and categorisation and counting of free-text responses.
Results: More than 90% of participants supported the principle of a standardised approach that systematically considers a range of intrapartum risk factors alongside fetal heart rate features. Over 80% of participants agreed on the importance of a proposed set of evidence-based risk factors underpinning such an approach, but many (over 75%) also indicated a need to clarify the clinical definitions of the proposed risk factors. A need for clarity was also suggested by participants' widely varying views on thresholds for actions of the proposed risk factors, particularly for meconium-stained liquor, rise in baseline fetal heart rate and changes in fetal heart rate variability. Most participants (>75%) considered a range of resources to support good practice as very useful when implementing the approach, such as when and how to escalate in different situations (82%), how to create a supportive culture (79%) and effective communication and decision-making with those in labour and their partners (75%).
Conclusions: We found strong professional support for the principle of a standardised approach to detection and response to intrapartum fetal deterioration and high agreement on the clinical importance of a set of evidence-based risk factors. Further work is needed to address: (1) clarity of clinical definitions of some risk factors, (2) building evidence and agreement on thresholds for action and (3) deimplementation strategies for existing local practices.
Keywords: Capacity Building; Health & safety; NEONATOLOGY; OBSTETRICS; Quality Improvement; Surveys and Questionnaires.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Each Baby Counts: 2020 Final Progress Report. London: RCOG; 2021. https://www.rcog.org.uk/eachbabycounts Available.
-
- NHS Resolution . Five Years of Cerebral Palsy Claims. A Thematic Review of NHS Resolution Data. London: NHS Resolution; 2017. https://resolution.nhs.uk/resources/five-years-of-cerebral-palsy-claims/ Available.
-
- Care Quality Commission (CQC) National review of maternity services in England 2022 to 2024. 2024. https://www.cqc.org.uk/publications/maternity-services-2022-2024 Available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous