Image-guided percutaneous ablative treatments for renal cell carcinoma
- PMID: 40050457
- PMCID: PMC12350574
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11480-w
Image-guided percutaneous ablative treatments for renal cell carcinoma
Abstract
In recent decades, percutaneous ablation procedures have evolved into a recognized treatment option for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Thermal ablation techniques, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and cryoablation (CA) are now incorporated in most treatment guidelines as a viable alternative, and in some cases, deemed equivalent to nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) or other surgical methods, especially for small renal masses (SRM) up to 4 cm. This review offers an overview of the most prevalent ablation techniques used to treat localized RCC. Additionally, it compares the oncological and clinical outcomes of these techniques with those of surgical options. Finally, it provides an assessment of the role that ablation treatment occupies in current guidelines. In conclusion, the use and incorporation of image-guided minimally invasive treatment options for RCC is on the rise. Existing data suggest that thermal ablation procedures (RFA, MWA, and CA) and partial nephrectomy yield comparable oncologic and clinical outcomes. Despite the data available, the recommendations for thermal ablations vary significantly across national and international guidelines. KEY POINTS: Question Despite growing evidence and integration in international guidelines, recommendations for ablative procedures in localized small renal cell cancer vary considerably. Findings Existing, mostly retrospective, data suggest that thermal ablation and partial nephrectomy yield comparable clinical results for small tumors. Clinical relevance Based on the current literature, thermal ablation of renal cell cancer up to 4 cm in size can be offered to patients as an alternative to surgery.
Keywords: Cryoablation; Microwave ablation; Partial nephrectomy; Radiofrequency Ablation; Renal cell carcinoma.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is PD Dr. Timo A. Auer. Conflict of interest: Timo A. Auer, Bernhard Gebauer, and Thomas Kröncke received honoraria and travel support from Boston Scientific, USA in the past. Federico Collettini received travel support from Boston Scientific, USA in the past. took part in this study and declared that they do not have anything to disclose regarding funding or conflict of interest with respect to this manuscript. Statistics and biometry: No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Informed consent: Written informed consent was not required for this study because neither patient was involved. Ethical approval: Institutional Review Board approval was not required because of the study's nature (review article). Study subjects or cohorts overlap: No study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported. Methodology: Review article
Figures
References
-
- Bukavina L, Bensalah K, Bray F et al (2022) Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma: 2022 update. Eur Urol 82:529–542 - PubMed
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70:7–30 - PubMed
-
- Campbell SC, Clark PE, Chang SS, Karam JA, Souter L, Uzzo RG (2021) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA guideline: part I. J Urol 206:199–208 - PubMed
-
- Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R et al (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136:E359–E386 - PubMed
-
- Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y et al (2022) European Association of Urology guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2022 update. Eur Urol 82:399–410 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
