Operative Treatment of Flail Chest Injuries Does Not Reduce Pain or In-Hospital Opioid Requirements: Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 40053576
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.01099
Operative Treatment of Flail Chest Injuries Does Not Reduce Pain or In-Hospital Opioid Requirements: Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Background: A previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute flail chest injuries revealed more ventilator-free days in operatively treated patients who had been ventilated at the time of randomization. It has been suggested that surgery for these injuries may also improve a patient's pain and function. Our goal was to perform a secondary analysis of the previous RCT to evaluate pain and postinjury opioid requirements in patients with operatively and nonoperatively treated unstable chest wall injuries.
Methods: We analyzed data from a previous multicenter RCT that had been conducted from 2011 to 2019. Patients who had sustained acute, unstable chest wall injuries were randomized to operative or nonoperative treatment. In-hospital pain medication logs were evaluated, and daily morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were calculated. The patients' symptoms were also assessed, including generalized pain, chest wall pain, chest wall tightness, and shortness of breath. Additionally, patients completed the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and they were followed for 1 year postinjury.
Results: In the original trial, 207 patients were analyzed: 99 patients received nonoperative treatment, and 108 received operative treatment. There were no significant differences in pain medication usage between the 2 groups at any of the examined time points (p = 0.477). There were no significant differences in generalized pain, chest wall pain, chest wall tightness, or shortness of breath at any time postinjury in the 2 groups. There were also no significant differences in the SF-36 scores.
Conclusions: This secondary analysis of a previous RCT suggested that operative treatment of patients with flail chest injuries does not reduce in-hospital daily opioid requirements. There were also no reductions in generalized pain, chest wall pain, chest wall tightness, or shortness of breath with operative treatment. The SF-36 scores were similar for both groups. Further work is needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from operative treatment of flail chest injuries.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2025 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: This study was funded by the AO Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and Physician Services, Inc. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/I476 ).
References
-
- Engel C, Krieg JC, Madey SM, Long WB, Bottlang M. Operative chest wall fixation with osteosynthesis plates. J Trauma. 2005 Jan;58(1):181-6.
-
- Nirula R, Diaz JJ Jr, Trunkey DD, Mayberry JC. Rib fracture repair: indications, technical issues, and future directions. World J Surg. 2009 Jan;33(1):14-22.
-
- Granetzny A, Abd El-Aal M, Emam E, Shalaby A, Boseila A. Surgical versus conservative treatment of flail chest. Evaluation of the pulmonary status. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;4(6):583-7.
-
- Lafferty PM, Anavian J, Will RE, Cole PA. Operative treatment of chest wall injuries: indications, technique, and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jan 5;93(1):97-110.
-
- Ahmed Z, Mohyuddin Z. Management of flail chest injury: internal fixation versus endotracheal intubation and ventilation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Dec;110(6):1676-80.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials