Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;27(3):e70045.
doi: 10.1111/codi.70045.

Evaluation of pelvic floor rehabilitation in the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome: Study protocol of the CONTICARE trial

Poinas Alexandra  1 , Périard Noémie  1   2 , Schirr-Bonnans Solène  3 , Hardouin Jean-Benoit  4   5 , Valery-Pierre Riche  3 , Cormerais Odile  6 , Guérineau Michel  6 , Valancogne Guy  6 , Antoine Hamy  7 , Ouaissi Mehdi  8 , Tourreau Yannick  9 , Lefevre Jeremie H  10   11 , Abdelli Amar  12 , Abet Emeric  13 , Balon Jean-Michel  14 , Valérie Bridoux  15 , Frédéric Dumont  16 , Fortin June  4 , Jobert Alexandra  4 , Guillaume Meurette  17 , Emilie Duchalais  1   2
Affiliations

Evaluation of pelvic floor rehabilitation in the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome: Study protocol of the CONTICARE trial

Poinas Alexandra et al. Colorectal Dis. 2025 Mar.

Erratum in

Abstract

Aim: Bowel dysfunction following sphincter-preserving rectal resection for cancer, commonly referred to as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Preventing this condition is essential for healthcare teams. Postoperative pelvic floor rehabilitation, including anal biofeedback therapy, has shown potential in alleviating established LARS symptoms. This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pelvic floor rehabilitation prior to bowel continuity restoration in preventing LARS in patients undergoing sphincter-preserving rectal resection for cancer.

Methods: CONTICARE is a national multicentre randomized trial. Patients who have undergone total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation and a defunctioning stoma (n = 174; 87 per arm) will be randomly assigned to either the rehabilitation or control group before stoma closure. The rehabilitation group will receive systematic pelvic floor rehabilitation, comprising four sessions before and six sessions after stoma closure, following a standardized approach. The control group will receive standard follow-up care, which includes symptom-based therapy after ileostomy closure. The primary outcome measure will be the severity of LARS, assessed using the dedicated LARS score at 6 months. Comparisons of faecal incontinence symptoms, quality of life and complications related to biofeedback therapy will also be evaluated at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year between the two groups.

Conclusion: Pelvic floor rehabilitation has the potential to enhance symptom management and quality of life for patients following rectal resection by preventing LARS. The combination of anal exercises and biofeedback therapy, which has been extensively studied without reported adverse effects, suggests that the anticipated benefits outweigh any potential risks.

Clinical trial registration: Registration number NCT03876561, first published on 15 March 2019.

Clinicaltrials: gov.

Keywords: LARS; colorectal cancer; perineal pelvic floor rehabilitation; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(8):1941–1953.
    1. Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC‐CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9666):821–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140‐6736(09)60485‐2
    1. Brouwer NPM, Bos ACRK, Lemmens VEPP, Tanis PJ, Hugen N, Nagtegaal ID, et al. An overview of 25 years of incidence, treatment and outcome of colorectal cancer patients: results from The Netherlands cancer registry. Int J Cancer. 2018;143(11):2758–2766.
    1. Keane C, Wells C, O'Grady G, Bissett IP. Defining low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Color Dis. 2017;19(8):713–722.
    1. Ridolfi TJ, Berger N, Ludwig KA. Low anterior resection syndrome: current management and future directions. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29(3):239–245.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data