The vicious circle of chronic kidney disease and hypertriglyceridemia: What is first, the hen or the egg?
- PMID: 40056689
- DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.119146
The vicious circle of chronic kidney disease and hypertriglyceridemia: What is first, the hen or the egg?
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is documented to cause alterations in lipid metabolism, and this was considered a potent driver of increased cardiovascular risk. Among the diverse alteration of lipid traits in CKD, research endeavours have predominantly concentrated on low-density lipoproteins (LDL) in view of the potent pro-atherogenic role of these lipoprotein particles and the demonstration of protective cardiovascular effect of reducing LDL. However, few studies have focused on the metabolism of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and even fewer on their role in causing kidney damage. Therefore, the comprehensive description of the impact of hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) in CKD pathophysiology remains largely undetermined. This reflects the difficulty of disentangling the independent role of triglycerides (TG) in the complex, bidirectional relationship between TG and kidney disease. Abnormal neutral lipid accumulation in the intrarenal vasculature and renal cells eventually due to HTG may also promote glomerular injury, throughout mechanisms including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and proinflammatory responses. While epidemiological and experimental evidence suggests a potential role of TG in kidney damage, the causal mechanisms and their clinical relevance remain unclear, representing a significant area for future investigation. This review aims to highlight the intricate interplay between TG metabolism and kidney disease, shedding light on the mechanisms through which HTG may influence kidney functionality.
Keywords: Chronic kidney disease (CKD); Chylomicrons (CM); Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG); Lipotoxicity; Podocytes; Proteinuria.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:The authors declare that they have no specific conflict of interest regarding this manuscript. They disclose conflicts of interest in the past 3 years: MA received research grant support from Amryt Pharmaceutical, Amgen, IONIS, Akcea Therapeutics, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, and Regeneron; served as a consultant for Amgen, Akcea Therapeutics, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Ultragenyx; and received fees for lecturing, congress participation, and advisory board participation from Amgen, Amryt Pharmaceutical, Daiichi-Sankyo, Regeneron, Sanofi, Amarin, and Ultragenyx. LD received personal fees for public speaking or consultancy or grant support from Amryt Pharmaceutical, Akcea Therapeutics, SOBI, AuroraBiopharma, Novartis, Amarin, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, Ultragenyx, Chiesi and Sandoz. SB received personal fees for public speaking from SOBI; detains stock options of Eli Lilly, UnitedHealth, Novo Nordisk, Merck, and Thermo Fisher Scientific; and received grants for meeting participation from Novartis; DT received personal fees for public speaking from SOBI; D.G. received consultation fees from Amgen, Amryt, Chiesi, Arrowhead, CRISPR Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Ionis, Novartis, Merck, Regeneron, Ultragenyx and Verve Therapeutics, and Trust research/joint research funds from Amgen, Arrowhead, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Ionis, Kowa, New Amsterdam, Novartis, Sanofi and Ultargenyx. ML received a PhD training grant from a university research center called: ‘’Centre Intersectoriel en Santé Durable’’. F.B. received speaking fees from Sandoz. BC received personal fees as speaker/advisory board from MSD, Astrazeneca, Novartis. DB, AL, ADC, IM, SC and MP have nothing to disclose.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical