Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;25(7):1502-1514.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.03.003. Epub 2025 Mar 7.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis D virus/hepatitis B virus coinfection in Italy: An intention-to-treat analysis of long-term outcomes

Affiliations
Free article

Liver transplantation for hepatitis D virus/hepatitis B virus coinfection in Italy: An intention-to-treat analysis of long-term outcomes

Roberta Angelico et al. Am J Transplant. 2025 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Patients with hepatitis D virus (HDV)/hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related end-stage liver disease candidates for liver transplantation (LT) have traditionally been regarded as a special population, although their outcomes are controversial. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis of long-term outcomes of HDV/HBV-coinfected patients waitlisted for LT in Italy, between 2011 and 2020, was performed and compared with HBV-monoinfected LT candidates. Of 1731 HBV-infected LT candidates, 1237 (71.5%) had HBV monoinfection and 494 (28.5%) HDV/HBV coinfection. At listing, HDV/HBV-coinfected patients were significantly younger, listed mainly for decompensated cirrhosis, and with fewer hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases; (26% vs 65.8%; P <.0001) compared with HBV-monoinfected patients. HDV/HBV-coinfected patients showed better 5-year ITT survival (83.2%; 95% CI: 79.4%-83.4%, vs 71.6%; 95% CI: 68.8%-74.2%; P < .0001). ITT-multivariable analysis identified the presence of HCC, advanced recipient age, and high model for end-stage liver disease-Na scores as mortality risk factors. Five years after LT, 99.1% of HDV/HBV-coinfected patients received oral nucleos(t)ide analogs, with immunoglobulins against antigen of the hepatitis B virus in 91.8% of cases. HBV and HDV viral recurrences were 1.1% and 0.2%, respectively, whereas recurrent or de novo HCC were 8.9% and 0.3%, respectively. In Italy, HDV/HBV-coinfected patients waitlisted for LT showed more favorable outcomes compared with HBV-monoinfected patients, both before and after LT. These excellent results, from the largest cohort reported so far, suggest that HDV/HBV-coinfected LT recipients do not represent a risky population and may be considered for simpler long-term antiviral prophylactic strategies.

Keywords: chirrosis; hepatitis B infection; hepatitis D infection; hepatocellularcarcinoma; liver transplantation; outcomes; viral prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by American Journal of Transplantation.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources