Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 8;21(1):156.
doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04605-2.

Feasibility of shear wave elastography (2D -SWE) to evaluate cristalline lens in healthy dogs

Affiliations

Feasibility of shear wave elastography (2D -SWE) to evaluate cristalline lens in healthy dogs

Giovanni Aste et al. BMC Vet Res. .

Abstract

Background: 2D shear wave elastography (2D SWE) is an emerging technique in veterinary medicine able to assess tissue stiffness in a non-invasive way. Nowadays no report is yet available about its application in assessing the mechanical properties of canine lenses.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of 2D SWE in assessing normal lens elasticity in healthy and ageing dogs.

Methods: Trans-corneal lens 2D SWE was performed under physical restraint on 33 dogs by two operators who collected triplicate kPa and m/s measures, with the aim to assess reproducibility and reliability of the technique, followed by the evaluation of eventual difference of stiffness in different ages (G1 < 1.5 years, G2 1.5 years-7 years and G3 > 7 years). The project has been approved by the CEISA Ethical Committee (Prot. N. 12/2019 361 CEISA). Written informed consent was obtained by all the owners.

Results: Mean elasticity values were respectively 4.78 ± 1.48 m/s and 74.9 ± 43.7 kPa for the left eye and 4.45 ± 0.98 m/s and 75.9 ± 43.6 kPa for the right eye. Despite a slight difference observed in the measurements obtained in m/s between the two operators, the intra-observer assessment was excellent in the overall population of dogs for both values in KPa and m/s, as well as the inter-observer one (ICC > 0.75). All the sCV% computed evidence a low measurement dispersion (< 12%). Mean lens stiffness for G1 was 3.1 ± 0.5 m/s and 28.9 ± 9.3 kPa, for G2 4.61 ± 0.62 m/s and 65 ± 18.4 kPa and for G3 6.46 ± 0.36 m/s and 126 ± 14.5 kPa; a significant difference P (< 0.001) was detected between all the groups.

Conclusions: It can be concluded that 2D SWE is a rapid and non-invasive US-based technique able to assess lens mechanical properties in companion animals since it is characterized by high reliability and reproducibility, providing also information regarding lens stiffness in aging dogs.

Keywords: 2D shear wave elastography; Dog; Lens; US.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The project has been approved by the CEISA Ethical Committee (Committee on Animal Research and Ethics of the Universities of Chieti-Pescara, Teramo, 360 L’Aquila and of the Experimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Abruzzo-Molise, Prot. N. 12/2019 361 CEISA). Written informed owner’s consent was obtained before starting the procedure. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
On the left side of the image, the B-mode image of the eye is presented, with the same B-mode image with the superimposition of the color map on the right ride (white solid arrows). The colorbar present on the left side of the image codifies the tissue stiffness, with blue for hard tissues and red for soft ones
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
On the B-mode image, the white solid arrow points at the circular ROI manually selected by the operator
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The same circular ROI pointed by the white solid arrow on the B-mode image is transposed by the system on the colormap on the right side of the image. The final output is the collection of the quantitative stiffness measurements expressed in both m/s and kPa (white dotted arrows)

Similar articles

References

    1. Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics. 2017;7(5):1303–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, Hall TJ, Bamber JC, Barr RG, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41(5):1126–47. - PubMed
    1. Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Fromageau J, Bojunga J, Calliada F, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34(2):169–84. - PubMed
    1. Cintra CA, Feliciano MaR, Santos VJC, Maronezi MC, Cruz IK, Gasser B, et al. Applicability of ARFI elastography in the evaluation of canine prostatic alterations detected by b-mode and doppler ultrasonography. Arquivo Brasileiro De Med Veterinária E Zootecnia. 2020;72(6):2135–40.
    1. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, Bojunga J, Correas JM, Gilja OH, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: clinical applications. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34(3):238–53. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources