Importance of Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry as a Risk Factor for Development of COPD, Also in Those Who Do Not Smoke
- PMID: 40058579
- PMCID: PMC12264347
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.025
Importance of Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry as a Risk Factor for Development of COPD, Also in Those Who Do Not Smoke
Abstract
Background: COPD is largely underdiagnosed. Active identification of cases is crucial to establish preventive measures before manifestation of clinical disease. The significance of different spirometric patterns preceding COPD, especially preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), has been highlighted but remains unclear.
Research question: Which clinical characteristics, smoking habits, and spirometric patterns, with primary focus on PRISm findings, precede the development of airway obstruction (AO)?
Study design and methods: The OLIN COPD Study was established from 2002 through 2004. After re-examination of population-based cohorts, individuals with AO (n = 993; FEV1 to VC ratio < 0.70) were identified together with control participants without AO (n = 993; FEV1 to VC ratio ≥ 0.70). Most of these people had participated in examinations during the 1980s or 1990s, and in total, 902 cases and 819 control participants had previous clinical data. Logistic regression was performed with case status as outcome and spirometric patterns, age, sex, smoking habits, and BMI at first examination as covariates.
Results: The mean (SD) person-years between first examination and inclusion in the OLIN COPD Study was 10.5 (4.0) years. At first examination, the prevalence of PRISm was higher in cases (18.6%) vs control participants (13.4%). Current smoking was more common in cases (45.1% vs 18.2%), whereas former smoking was similar (31.8% vs 34.9%). Cases reported more respiratory symptoms (78.0% vs 44.3%) than control participants. At first examination, PRISm, current smoking, and former smoking were strongly associated with becoming a case when adjusted for confounders, with adjusted OR (aOR) of 3.5, 4.1, and 1.5, respectively. When stratifying for smoking habits, aORs for PRISm in those with current smoking, former smoking, and nonsmoking status were 2.9, 3.8 and 3.7, respectively.
Interpretation: In this study, PRISm was associated with transition into AO corresponding to COPD within 1 decade, independent of smoking habits and with similar strength of association among those who have never smoked, who formerly smoked, and who currently smoke.
Keywords: COPD; PRISm; asthma; case-control studies; dyspnea; productive cough; respiratory symptoms; smoking; spirometry.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: H. B. reports personal fees from Chiesi, outside the submitted work. C. S. reports personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, and TEVA and fees for advisory board work from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline, all outside the submitted work. A. L. reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and fees for advisory board work from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novartis, all outside the submitted work. None declared (T. M., L. H., E. R.).
Figures




References
-
- Lamprecht B., Soriano J.B., Studnicka M., et al. Determinants of underdiagnosis of COPD in national and international surveys. Chest. 2015;148(4):971–985. - PubMed
-
- Axelsson M., Backman H., Nwaru B.I., et al. Underdiagnosis and misclassification of COPD in Sweden: a Nordic Epilung study. Respir Med. 2023;217 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical