Why do people still make anti-D over 50 years after the introduction of Rho(D) immune globulin? A Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative study
- PMID: 40059673
- DOI: 10.1111/trf.18202
Why do people still make anti-D over 50 years after the introduction of Rho(D) immune globulin? A Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative study
Abstract
Background: Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIg) is used to reduce RhD alloimmunization in pregnancy. This study describes potential causes for RhD alloimmunization after the development and implementation of RhIg.
Study design and methods: This retrospective descriptive study investigated RhD-negative patients born in 1965-2005 with anti-D newly identified during 2018-2022. Transfusion, pregnancy, intravenous drug abuse, and transplantation were considered potential alloimmunization sources.
Results: There were 1200 study patients (852 females; 348 males) at 30 institutions in 5 countries (USA, Canada, UK, New Zealand, Brazil). Most patients had a single potential source of alloimmunization identified (857/1200, 71%), most commonly pregnancy among females (537/852, 63%) and transfusion among males (180/348, 52%). When multiple potential sources were included, males were more likely than females to have a history of transfusion (235/348 [68%] vs. 149/852 [17%], p < .0001) and confirmed or suspected intravenous drug abuse (100/348 [29%] vs. 138/852 [16%], p < .0001). Among females with a history of pregnancy, 119/718 (17%) had healthcare access issues, 120/718 (17%) had pregnancy in a country where they may not have received RhIg, and 21/718 (3%) refused RhIg. Among patients with a history of transfusion, males were more likely than females to have received RhD-positive red blood cells or whole blood (143/235 [61%] vs. 30/149 [20%], p < .0001) and/or platelets (84/235 [36%] vs. 19/149 [13%], p < .0001).
Discussion: Pregnancy was the most frequently identified potential source of RhD alloimmunization among females. Transfusion was most frequent in males. Intravenous drug abuse as a common potential source among patients with RhD alloimmunization merits further study.
Keywords: Rho(D) immune globulin (RhIg); alloimmunization; anti‐D; intravenous drug abuse; pregnancy; transfusion; transplant.
© 2025 AABB.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ree IMC, Smits‐Wintjens VEHJ, van der Bom JG, van Klink JMM, Oepkes D, Lopriore E. Neonatal management and outcome in alloimmune hemolytic disease. Expert Rev Hematol. 2017;10(7):607–616.
-
- Liumbruno GM, D'Alessandro A, Rea F, Piccinini V, Catalano L, Calizzani G, et al. The role of antenatal immunoprophylaxis in the prevention of maternal‐foetal anti‐Rh(D) alloimmunisation. Blood Transfus. 2010;8(1):8–16.
-
- Bowman J. The management of hemolytic disease in the fetus and newborn. Semin Perinatol. 1997;21(1):39–44.
-
- Hemolytic FV. Hemolytic disease. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1973;16(1):72–102.
-
- Finn R, Clarke CA, Donohoe WT, McConnell RB, Sheppard PM, Lehane D, et al. Experimental studies on the prevention of Rh haemolytic disease. Br Med J. 1961;1(5238):1486–1490.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
