Surgical removal of pulmonary flow restrictors in children with congenital heart disease: What the outcomes reveal
- PMID: 40061526
- PMCID: PMC11883757
- DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.11.011
Surgical removal of pulmonary flow restrictors in children with congenital heart disease: What the outcomes reveal
Abstract
Objective: Pulmonary flow restrictors (PFRs) are interesting devices, but their surgical removal outcomes are poorly understood.
Methods: Retrospective review of clinical data from children with bilateral PFRs who underwent device removal during follow-up surgery.
Results: Thirty-four PFRs were explanted from 17 patients (41.2% boys) at a median of 2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 1.2-5.2 months) postimplantation, with a median patient age of 2.5 months (IQR, 1.6-5.8 months). One patient experienced life-threatening bilateral pulmonary artery (PA) aneurysms 2 months after PFR implantation, necessitating urgent surgery. Two PFRs were found migrated across the left PA's upper lobe branch origin. Twenty-six were removed intact, 1 in 2 fragments, and 7 piecemeal. No thrombus was noted. Neoendothelium was observed on 11 PFRs. Seven PFRs caused endothelial damage, requiring sharp and blunt dissection for removal. Six right and 4 left PA arteriotomies were patched. Hegar dilators, with median sizes of 7 mm (IQR, 6.8-8.3 mm) for right PA and 7 mm (IQR, 7-8 mm) for left PA, confirmed branch patency. At a median follow-up of 14.8 months (IQR, 10.2-18.3 months), echocardiographic maximum velocities in 13 biventricular patients and 2 awaiting future biventricular repair were 1.5 m/second (IQR, 1.4-1.7 m/second) for the left PA and 1.6 m/second (IQR, 1.4-1.7 m/second) for the right PA. One patient with deferred Norwood had normal PAs and well-positioned PFRs on prestage-II catheterization. A patient who underwent stage-II Norwood 3.2 months post-PFR implantation died from sepsis 1 month later, but post-Glenn angiogram revealed no stenosis.
Conclusions: PFR removal is safe and effective. Complications are manageable, with no PA stenosis observed.
Keywords: congenital heart disease; microvascular plug; pulmonary artery band; pulmonary flow restrictor; stage-I Norwood procedure.
© 2024 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Alnoor M., Ing F.F. Use of flow restrictors in congenital heart disease. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2024;13(3):333–341. - PubMed
-
- Oppido G., Pace Napoleone C., Turci S., Angeli E., Gargiulo G. Pulmonary artery debanding. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;2012 - PubMed
-
- Dobell A.R., Murphy D.A., Poirier N.L., Gibbons J.E. The pulmonary artery after debanding. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1973;65(1):32–36. - PubMed
-
- Davies R.R., Radtke W.A., Klenk D., Pizarro C. Bilateral pulmonary arterial banding results in an increased need for subsequent pulmonary artery interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147(2):706–712. - PubMed
-
- Khan A.H., Hoskoppal D., Kumar T.K.S., et al. Utility of the Medtronic microvascular plug™ as a transcatheter implantable and explantable pulmonary artery flow restrictor in a swine model. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(7):1320–1328. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
