Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 5):S4693-S4696.
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1184_24. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

Radiographic Assessment of the Marginal Bone Loss Around the Implant Before and After the Prosthesis Placement-A Comparative Study

Affiliations

Radiographic Assessment of the Marginal Bone Loss Around the Implant Before and After the Prosthesis Placement-A Comparative Study

Mohammad Jalaluddin et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: The present investigation performed the CBCT to measure the marginal bone loss surrounding the implant both before and after the prosthesis was placed.

Materials and methods: Within the age range of 21 to 45 years, a total of 20 patients were involved, and all participants gave their informed consent. Immediate implant was inserted and ceramic prosthesis was prepared and given to the patients. Radiographic assessment was carried out using the CBCT at baseline, three months, and six months following the prosthesis. The circumference of the crestal bone level around the implant was measured in all directions (mesial, distal, buccal, and palatal), using the implant's first thread as a standard reference point.

Results: The change of the mean marginal bone level at the time of implant placement to three months after the prosthesis was at mesial 1.32 ± 0.02 to 1.46 ± 0.10, at distal 1.46 ± 0.08 to 1.94 ± 0.14, at buccal 1.28 ± 0.01 to 1.40 ± 0.06, at palatal 1.20 ± 0.03 to 1.22 ± 0.04. The change of the mean marginal bone level at the time of implant placement to six months after the prosthesis was at mesial 1.32 ± 0.02 to 1.84 ± 0.12, at distal 1.46 ± 0.08 to 2.38 ± 0.02, at buccal 1.28 ± 0.01 to 1.78 ± 0.04, at palatal 1.20 ± 0.03 to 1.34 ± 0.01.

Conclusion: The current investigation came to the conclusion that the CBCT provides all the diagnostic information required for an implant to be placed successfully.

Keywords: CBCT; dental implant; marginal bone; prosthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Blanco J, Carral C, Argibay O, Liñares A. Implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Periodontol 2000. 2019;79:151–67. - PubMed
    1. Lombardi T, Berton F, Salgarello S, Barbalonga E, Rapani A, Piovesana F, et al. Factors influencing early marginal bone loss around dental implants positioned subcrestally: A multicentre prospective clinical study. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1168. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mandelaris GA, Neiva R, Chambrone L. Cone-beam computed tomography and interdisciplinary dentofacial therapy: An American Academy of Periodontology best evidence review focusing on risk assessment of the dentoalveolar bone changes influenced by tooth movement. J Periodontol. 2017;88:960–77. - PubMed
    1. Pinheiro LR, Scarfe WC, Oliveira MA, Gaia BF, Gonzalez AR, Cavalcanti MG. Effect of cone-beam computed tomography field of view and acquisition frame on the detection of chemically simulated peri-implant bone loss in vitro. J of Periodontol. 2015;86:1159–65. - PubMed
    1. Nandal S, Ghalaut P, Shekhawat H. A radiological evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants: An in vivo study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2014;5:126–37. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources