Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025;32(2):130-141.
doi: 10.5603/cj.103883. Epub 2025 Mar 10.

The utility of brain biomarkers in predicting survival and neurological outcomes in pediatric patients after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The utility of brain biomarkers in predicting survival and neurological outcomes in pediatric patients after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Halla Kamińska et al. Cardiol J. 2025.

Abstract

Background: Cardiac arrest in children is associated with high morbidity and mortality, primarily due to neurological injury. Biomarkers linked to brain injury, released into circulation from compromised elements of the neurovascular unit, act as significant prognostic indicators in patients suffering from hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI) subsequent to the restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after pediatric cardiac arrest. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the prognostic utility of brain injury biomarkers in predicting neurological outcomes and survival in patients following cardiac arrest in the pediatric population.

Methods: Bibliographic databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase) were searched from their inception to November 2024. A random-effect model was used for all analyses.

Results: Our meta-analysis demonstrates significant associations between various biomarkers and survival or neurological outcomes after cardiac arrest. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels were consistently elevated in non-survivors and patients with unfavorable neurological outcomes, with pronounced differences observed on Days 2 and 3 (e.g., Day 3 mean difference: -88.48, 95%CI: -146.77 to -30.19, P = 0.003). Emerging biomarkers, including UCH-L1 and GFAP, showed striking differences, such as elevated UCH-L1 levels on Day 1 (mean difference: -415.41, 95%CI: -474.41 to -356.61, P < 0.001) and GFAP levels exceeding 4000 ng/mL in non-survivors on Day 2 (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our findings underscore the significant prognostic value of biomarkers in predicting survival and neurological outcomes following cardiac arrest. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) consistently demonstrated its reliability across multiple time points, while emerging biomarkers like UCH-L1 and GFAP showed promising potential for early outcome stratification.

Keywords: S100β protein; brain markers; cardiac arrest; meta-analysis; neuron-specific enolase; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart of the included studies
Figure 2
Figure 2
Group differences in brain biomarkers between survivors and patients who died (patients who survived [blue circles] and died [red squares]) outcomes at 0-, 24-, 48-, and 72-hours after return of spontaneous circulation report the mean concentration and spread (SD). Each graph notes the number of patients and studies included in determining the mean and standard deviation for each point. A. Neuron-specific enolase: Y-axis: NSE [conc] (μg/L), X-axis: Hours from ROSC; B. S100 Calcium binding protein B: Y-axis: S100B [conc] (μg/L), X-axis: Hours from ROSC; C. Neurofilament light chain: Y-axis: NFL [conc] (pg/mL), X-axis: Hours from ROSC; D. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1: Y-axis: UCH-L1 [conc] (pg/mL), X-axis: Hours from ROSC; E. Tau protein: Y-axis: Tau [conc] (pg/mL), X-axis: Hours from ROSC; F. Glial fibrillary acidic protein: Y-axis: GFAP [conc] (pg/mL), X-axis: Hours from ROSC
Figure 3
Figure 3
Group differences in brain biomarkers between patients with favorable and unfavorable neurologic outcome (patients with favorable [blue circles] and unfavorable [red squares] outcomes) at 0-, 24-, 48-, and 72-hours after return of spontaneous circulation report the mean concentration and spread (SD). Each graph notes the number of patients and studies included in determining the mean and standard deviation for each point. Biomarkers at different time points after ROSC (return of spontaneous circulation). A. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE): Y-axis: NSE [conc] (μg/L), X-axis: Hours from ROSC, Trend: Increase in NSE levels over time, especially in the red dashed-line group; B. S100 Calcium binding protein B (S100B): Y-axis: S100B [conc] (μg/L), X-axis: Hours from ROSC, Trend: Initial increase followed by a decrease; C. Neurofilament light chain (NFL): Y-axis: NFL [conc] (pg/mL), X-axis: Hours from ROSC, Trend: Significant increase over time, particularly in the red dashed-line group; D. Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1): Y-axis: UCH-L1 [conc] (pg/mL), X-axis: Hours from ROSC, Trend: Increase up to 24–48 hours, then stabilization; E. Tau protein: Y-axis: Tau [conc] (pg/mL), X-axis: Hours from ROSC, Trend: Significant differences between groups, large variability in values; F. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP): Y-axis: GFAP [conc] (pg/mL), X-axis: Hours from ROSC, Trend: Gradual increase in values over time. Red dashed line — possibly indicates a group with poor prognosis. Blue dashed line — possibly indicates a group with better prognosis. All graphs represent mean values with confidence intervals

References

    1. Garbin S, Easter J. Pediatric Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2023;41(3):465–484. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2023.03.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Topjian AA, de Caen A, Wainwright MS, et al. Pediatric Post-Cardiac Arrest Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;140(6):e194–e233. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000697. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sandroni C, Cronberg T, Sekhon M. Brain injury after cardiac arrest: pathophysiology, treatment, and prognosis. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(12):1393–1414. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06548-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurek K, Swieczkowski D, Pruc M, et al. Predictive Performance of Neuron-Specific Enolase (NSE) for Survival after Resuscitation from Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2023;12(24) doi: 10.3390/jcm12247655. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Czerwińska-Jelonkiewicz K, Wood A, Bohm A, et al. Association between dose of catecholamines and markers of organ injury early after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cardiol J. 2021;30(6):946–956. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0173. [Epub ahead of print] - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms