Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 1;109(8):1425-1436.
doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005364. Epub 2025 Mar 11.

Identifying the Unmet Healthcare Needs of Kidney Transplant Recipients Who Experience Graft Loss: Learning From Patients' Experience

Affiliations

Identifying the Unmet Healthcare Needs of Kidney Transplant Recipients Who Experience Graft Loss: Learning From Patients' Experience

Anita Marie Slominska et al. Transplantation. .

Abstract

Background: Kidney transplant recipients with graft loss (KTR-GL) are an increasing group of patients whose care needs are largely unmet. The lack of patient perspectives is a key research gap. We conducted an in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL to identify their healthcare needs.

Methods: This qualitative study adopted an interpretive descriptive methodology. Data collection entailed semistructured narrative interviews conducted until data saturation was achieved and was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Our sample included 23 KTR-GL (women: 34.8%; mean age, 54.3 y). Six themes were identified that represent areas in which participants' needs may be inadequately acknowledged and/or met: (1) setting expectations (longevity of the graft, transplant is not a cure, risk of graft failure, anticipating transplant loss, and balancing hope and realism), (2) communicating with care team (support and empathy and clarifying the cause of graft failure), (3) support for transition to dialysis (shaped by prior experience, preparedness for the initiation of dialysis, lack of options, and dialysis requires adjustment), (4) navigating the path to retransplantation (understanding patient preferences, clarity and transparency, addressing ineligibility, preemptive transplant, and living donation), (5) psychosocial resources (access to psychological services, specific and adequate psychological support, reliable social worker, and peer support), and (6) lessons learned (building mutual trust, self-advocacy, defining a successful transplant, and gaining resilience).

Conclusions: In this in-depth exploration of the experiences of KTR-GL, we have identified several unmet healthcare needs that have practice and policy implications. Incorporating a patient-centered approach is needed to improve the healthcare experiences and, potentially, the outcomes of KTR-GL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S.S. received an education grant from Amgen Canada to improve the care of patients with graft failure and received speaking honorarium from AstraZeneca. S.S. is supported by the Chercheur boursier clinicien—Junior 1 award, and M.-C.F. is supported by the chercheur boursier clinician Senior award from the Fonds de recherche du Québec, Santé. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. 2023 USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Available at https://adr.usrds.org/2023 . Accessed July 31, 2024.
    1. Davis S, Mohan S. Managing patients with failing kidney allograft: many questions remain. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;17:444–451.
    1. Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation. Available at https://www.transplant-observatory.org/data-charts-and-tables/ . Accessed May 1, 2024.
    1. Hariharan S, Israni AK, Danovitch G. Long-term survival after kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:729–743.
    1. Ibrahim HN, Murad DN, Knoll GA. Thinking outside the box: novel kidney protective strategies in kidney transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;16:1890–1897.

Publication types

Grants and funding