Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 10;9(3):e70097.
doi: 10.1002/hem3.70097. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Cell-free DNA for detection and monitoring of extramedullary AML relapse

Affiliations

Cell-free DNA for detection and monitoring of extramedullary AML relapse

Henri C Hupe et al. Hemasphere. .

Abstract

Isolated extramedullary manifestations (IEM) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are recurrent events, especially following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). To date, measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment for this difficult-to-treat patient cohort has not been established. In this study, we evaluated highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS) of IEM-AML tumor and compared it with cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma, as well as highly sensitive NGS analysis of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), in a cohort of 15 IEM-AML patients with 19 IEM-AML episodes. cfDNA demonstrated a superior representation of IEM-AML tumor mutations compared to BMMC or PBMC, with a median variant allele frequency (VAF) of 0.8% and a mutation detection rate of 62% (37 of 60 mutations), compared to a median VAF of 0.05% and detection rate of 27%, respectively (16 of 60 mutations, p < 0.01). Among 44 mutations identified in 14 IEM-AML relapse tumors, 30 mutations (68%) were known from initial diagnosis. Using diagnostic mutations from initial diagnosis for MRD analysis and detection of IEM-AML relapse, 16 of 17 IEM-AML relapse episodes were detected via cfDNA, whereas only 7 of 17 were identified using conventional analysis of BMMC or PBMC. Our findings demonstrate that cfDNA analysis from plasma effectively captures the molecular profile of IEM-AML. More than one-third of clinically relevant mutations were exclusively detected through cfDNA and were missed by conventional NGS-MRD of BMMC or PBMC. These results suggest that MRD monitoring using cfDNA offers a more comprehensive and sensitive approach to detecting IEM-AML relapse compared to standard methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M. H. declares honoraria from Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Miltenyi, Otsuka, Qiagen, and Servier; paid consultancy for Abbvie, AvenCell, Ascentage Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, LabDelbert, Novartis, Pfizer, and Servier; and research funding to his institution from Abbvie, Bayer Pharma AG, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Glycostem, Karyopharm, PinotBio, Servier, and Toray. S. B. received a speaker honorary from ThermoFisher. U. L. declares honoraria and travel support from AstraZeneca, BMS, GSK, Menarini Stemline, Novartis, QuIP, and Servier. F. H. H. served as an advisor for Novartis, CTI, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, Abbvie, GSK, Merck, and AOP and received research funding from Novartis, Celgene/BMS, and CTI. N. D. D. declares research funding to her institution from Illumina. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
IEM‐AML relapse mutations are represented in cfDNA. (A) Frequency of genes that were mutated in the IEM‐AML tumor tissue of 15 patients was assessed by highly sensitive NGS. (B) Ratio of IEM‐AML mutations and (C) IEM‐AML episodes that were detected by NGS analysis of cfDNA using the mutations from IEM‐AML tumor tissue. (D) Comparison of VAF (%) between IEM‐AML tumor and cfDNA. atyp, atypical; cfDNA, cell‐free DNA; eps., episodes; IEM, isolated extramedullary AML; inv, inversion; ITD, internal tandem duplication; TKD, tyrosine kinase domain; VAF, variant allele frequency.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of cfDNA versus MC‐derived DNA for detection of IEM‐AML. (A) Number of detected IEM‐AML mutations and (B) number of IEM‐AML episodes in the cfDNA and BM/PBMC compartments. (C) VAF comparison of matched mutations between cfDNA and BM/PBMC‐derived DNA for all IEM‐AML episodes. BM, bone marrow; cfDNA, cell‐free DNA; IEM, isolated extramedullary AML; eps, episodes; mut, mutations; MC, mononuclear cells; mut., mutated; PB, peripheral blood; VAF, variant allele frequency.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Clonal evolution of mutations from the initial diagnosis to IEM‐AML relapse. Number of mutations lost and gained at IEM‐AML relapse sorted by mutation classes, from 14 AML patients who developed an IEM‐AML relapse. Thrity of 44 (68%) mutations found in the IEM‐AML relapse tumor were known from the initial diagnosis. atyp, atypical; IEM, isolated extramedullary AML; Inv, inversion; ITD, internal tandem duplication; no., number; TFS, transcription factors; transd, transduction; TKD, tyrosine kinase domain.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Longitudinal NGS‐MRD analysis of mutations from IEM‐AML tumors using cfDNA and BM/PBMC. X‐axis: Time before (negative values) and after (positive values) the first IEM‐AML episode (First IEM‐AML = 0). Y‐axis: Number of patients included in our retrospective analysis. Green diamond and line: Both cfDNA and BM/PBMC‐derived DNA analysis positive. Blue diamond and line: Both cfDNA and BM/PBMC‐derived DNA analysis negative. Yellow diamond: cfDNA analysis positive, BM/PBMC‐derived DNA analysis negative. Yellow triangle: cfDNA analysis positive, BM/PBMC sample not available. Yellow line: cfDNA analysis positive. Red circle: Second IEM‐AML during the course of the disease. Black rectangle: Patient deceased. Triangle at the end: Patient still alive at last follow‐up. Gray line: No data available at that time point. Dashed lines: MRD‐status before first IEM‐AML. Solid lines: MRD‐status after 1st IEM‐AML. BM, bone marrow; cfDNA, cell‐free DNA; IEM, isolated extramedullary; MRD, measurable residual disease; N/A, not available; PB, peripheral blood.

References

    1. Lee KH, Lee JH, Choi SJ, et al. Bone marrow vs extramedullary relapse of acute leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: risk factors and clinical course. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;32(8):835‐842. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704223 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watts JM, Wang XV, Swords RT, et al. Very late relapse of AML after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is often extramedullary. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(7):1013‐1015. 10.1038/bmt.2016.44 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yuda S, Fuji S, Onishi A, et al. Extramedullary relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25(6):1152‐1157. 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.01.011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kewan T, Bahaj WS, Gurnari C, et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of extramedullary acute myeloid leukemias. Leukemia. 2024;38(9):2032‐2036. 10.1038/s41375-024-02337-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris AC, Kitko CL, Couriel DR, et al. Extramedullary relapse of acute myeloid leukemia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: incidence, risk factors and outcomes. Haematologica. 2013;98(2):179‐184. 10.3324/haematol.2012.073189 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources