Overcoming physiological trade-offs between flowering time and crop yield: strategies for a changing climate
- PMID: 40066745
- PMCID: PMC12223507
- DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eraf110
Overcoming physiological trade-offs between flowering time and crop yield: strategies for a changing climate
Abstract
Early flowering of annual plants can lead to resource limitation owing to reduced uptake of nitrogen during the reproductive phase and declining foliar photosynthesis as a result of monocarpic senescence. Low availability of accumulated resources can therefore result in a trade-off between early flowering and reproductive fitness. However, green inflorescence organs (such as siliques, pods, bracts, or awns) can make considerable contributions to photosynthetic carbon gain, and in some cases provide more carbon to seed formation than the leaves. Inflorescence photosynthesis may thereby overcome the flowering time trade-off. In addition to providing photosynthates, inflorescence organs can contribute to seed nitrogen through senescence-dependent nitrogen recycling. In annual crops, breeding has resulted in increased carbon allocation to the grain and higher harvest index, but in some cases this had led to reduced grain protein content. We discuss different breeding targets to address carbon and nitrogen limitation, dependent on the climatic environment. For environments that are prone to drought, we propose a combination of early flowering with enhanced inflorescence photosynthesis or, alternatively, delayed senescence (stay-green) associated with improved water balance. For optimized yield and grain protein content under favourable conditions, enhanced sink strength and extended nitrogen uptake are suggested as breeding targets.
Keywords: Crop yield; flowering time; harvest index; inflorescence photosynthesis; nitrogen-use efficiency; phenology; resource allocation; senescence; source–sink; stay-green.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflict of interest declared.
Figures
References
-
- Aarssen LW, Clauss MJ.. 1992. Genotypic variation in fecundity allocation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Ecology 80, 109–114.
-
- Araus JL, Brown HR, Febrero A, Bort J, Serret MD.. 1993. Ear photosynthesis, carbon isotope discrimination and the contribution of respiratory CO2 to differences in grain mass in durum wheat. Plant, Cell & Environment 16, 383–392.
-
- Araus JL, Sanchez-Bragado R, Vicente R.. 2021. Improving crop yield and resilience through optimization of photosynthesis: panacea or pipe dream? Journal of Experimental Botany 72, 3936–3955. - PubMed
-
- Arous A, Adda A, Belkhodja M, Bouzid A, Merah O.. 2020. The contribution of green plant parts to grain filling of durum wheat under water deficit. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 26, 809–815.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
