Long-term outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a single-centre Australian experience
- PMID: 40066919
- DOI: 10.1111/imj.70014
Long-term outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a single-centre Australian experience
Abstract
Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has become an established alternative to overcome conventional transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) lead-related complications.
Aims: To describe the long-term outcomes of S-ICD implantation at a single Australian institution.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD implantation from 2015 to 2019.
Results: In total, 128 patients (median age 52.5 years, 70% male) underwent S-ICD implantation. The indication was primary prevention in 86 patients (66%), and 22 patients (17%) had a previous transvenous device. Seventy-seven patients (60%) had heart failure, and the median left ventricular ejection fraction was 36% (29%-60%). The procedure was performed under general anaesthesia in 124 patients (97%), and the median procedure time was 105 min (interquartile range (IQR) 90-120). During a median follow-up of 4.7 years (IQR 3.8-5.8), 15 patients (12%) died, none of which were due to sudden death or device-related complications. Inappropriate shocks occurred in 17 patients (13.3%), predominantly due to T-wave oversensing (4.7%) and supraventricular arrhythmias (4.7%), and 15 patients (11.7%) received appropriate shocks. During the follow-up period, the S-ICD system was revised to TV-ICD in 10 patients (8%), and 24 patients (19%) required S-ICD generator change. Four patients (3%) underwent surgical intervention due to lead (two) or pocket-related (two) complications, and two patients (1.5%) developed pocket infection without systemic sepsis.
Conclusion: In this single-centre study, S-ICDs were implanted safely with acceptable device performance and clinical outcomes over long-term follow-up.
Keywords: appropriate shock; inappropriate shock; subcutaneous implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator.
© 2025 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
References
-
- Bardy GH, Lee Kl Fau Mark DB, Mark Db Fau Poole JE, Poole Je Fau Packer DL, Packer Dl Fau Boineau R, Boineau R Fau Domanski M et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 225–237.
-
- Moss AJ, Zareba W, Fau Hall WJ, Hall Wj Fau Klein H, Klein H Fau Wilber DJ, Wilber Dj Fau Cannom DS et al. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 877–883.
-
- Ezekowitz JA, Rowe B, Fau Dryden DM, Dryden Dm Fau Hooton N, Hooton N Fau Vandermeer B, Vandermeer B Fau Spooner C et al. Systematic review: implantable cardioverter defibrillators for adults with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Ann Int Med 2007; 147: 1539–3704.
-
- Kleemann T, Becker T, Fau Doenges K, Doenges K Fau Vater M, Vater M FSJ, Senges J Fau Schneider S et al. Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators over a period of >10 years. AHA 2007; 115: 2474–2480.
-
- Koneru JN, Jones PW, Hammill EF, Wold N, Ellenbogen KA. Risk factors and temporal trends of complications associated with transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillator leads. JAHA 2018; 7: e007691.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
