Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Mar;45(3):e70050.
doi: 10.1002/micr.70050.

Objectifying Clinical Outcomes After Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis and Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer in the Treatment of Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Brett A Hahn  1 , Alieske Kleeven  2 , Milan C Richir  3 , Arjen J Witkamp  3 , Anke M J Kuijpers  4 , Tim de Jong  5 , Shan Qiu  2 , J Henk Coert  1 , David D Krijgh  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Objectifying Clinical Outcomes After Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis and Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer in the Treatment of Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Brett A Hahn et al. Microsurgery. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Upper extremity lymphedema (UEL) and lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) can develop as a result of lymph node dissection in the treatment of various malignancies. While emerging microsurgical interventions using lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) show promising outcomes for patients with lymphedema, the best approach to implementing the two procedures remains to be defined. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive overview of published literature on the clinical improvement of extremity lymphedema in patients who undergo either LVA, VLNT, or a combined microsurgical procedure.

Methods: From Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases, 52 studies were identified that met inclusion criteria. This review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool and the Cochrane tool for randomized trials (RoB 2).

Results: Random-effects meta-analyses of means estimated a pooled clinical improvement of 36.46% (95% CI: 29.44-43.48) for UEL and 34.16% (95% CI: 23.93-44.40) for LEL. Subgroup analyses revealed differences in clinical improvement according to the microsurgical approach. Clinical improvement of UEL was 29.44% (95% CI: 15.58-43.29) for LVA, 41.66% (95% CI: 34.13-49.20) for VLNT, and 32.80% (95% CI: 21.96-43.64) for combined VLNT + LVA, while the improvement of LEL was 31.87% (95% CI: 18.60-45.14) for LVA and 39.53% (95% CI: 19.37-59.69) for VLNT.

Conclusion: The findings from this study elucidate the clinical improvement in extremity lymphedema from various microsurgical approaches. This knowledge could aid physicians in the shared decision-making process with UEL and LEL patients and better facilitate proper patient selection for microsurgical interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of systematic database search.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Forest plot of clinical improvement of upper extremity lymphedema (UEL) according to microsurgery type.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plot of clinical improvement of lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) according to microsurgery type.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agko, M. , Ciudad P., and Chen H. C.. 2018. “Staged Surgical Treatment of Extremity Lymphedema With Dual Gastroepiploic Vascularized Lymph Node Transfers Followed by Suction‐Assisted Lipectomy—A Prospective Study.” Journal of Surgical Oncology 117, no. 6: 1148–1156. 10.1002/jso.24969. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alitalo, K. 2011. “The Lymphatic Vasculature in Disease.” Nature Medicine 17, no. 11: 1371–1380. 10.1038/nm.2545. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aljaaly, H. A. , Fries C. A., and Cheng M. H.. 2019. “Dorsal Wrist Placement for Vascularized Submental Lymph Node Transfer Significantly Improves Breast Cancer‐Related Lymphedema.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open 7, no. 2: e2149. 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002149. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arrivé, L. , Derhy S., Dlimi C., El Mouhadi S., Monnier‐Cholley L., and Becker C.. 2017. “Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Lymphography for Evaluation of Lymph Node Transfer for Secondary Upper Limb Lymphedema.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 140, no. 6: 806–811. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003862. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balduzzi, S. , Rücker G., and Schwarzer G.. 2019. “How to Perform a Meta‐Analysis With R: A Practical Tutorial.” Evidence‐Based Mental Health 22, no. 4: 153–160. 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117. - DOI - PMC - PubMed