Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250491.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0491.

Bowel Disorder Incidence and Rectal Spacer Use in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy

Affiliations

Bowel Disorder Incidence and Rectal Spacer Use in Patients With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy

Michael R Folkert et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: The polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel spacer (PHS) system temporarily separates the rectum from the prostate in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa).

Objective: To compare incidence of bowel disorders and related procedures in patients receiving RT with and without PHS.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used 4 datasets: Medicare 5% Standard Analytic Files, Medicare 100% Standard Analytic Files, Merative MarketScan Commercial Database, and Premier Healthcare Database. Participants included adult patients with PCa undergoing RT from 2015 to 2021.

Exposure: Placement of PHS.

Main outcomes: All-cause bowel disorders and related procedures, identified from diagnosis and procedure codes. Results were compared with age-matched male general population without PCa or RT.

Results: Of 261 906 patients with PCa included in the study, 25 167 (9.6%) received PHS (mean [SD] age, 70.7 [6.5] years) and 236 739 did not (mean [SD] age, 71.1 [7.5] years). One year prior to RT, patients who received PHS had a lower mean (SD) Charlson Comorbidity Index score than those who did not (2.48 [1.08] vs 3.14 [1.95]; P < .001). Stereotactic RT was more common in patients who received PHS (2743 [10.9%] vs 8810 [3.7%]; P < .001), while intensity-modulated RT was less common (12 755 [50.7%] vs 142 402 [60.2%]; P < .001). After 4 years post RT, patients who received PHS had a 25% lower hazard of bowel disorders (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.72-0.78]; P < .001) and a 46% lower hazard of related procedures (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.47-0.62]; P < .001) than patients who did not receive PHS. Patients without PHS had higher hazard compared with an age-matched general population (disorders: 17.1% [95% CI, 17.3%-17.6%] vs 10.3% [95% CI, 10.1%-10.5%]; HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.32-1.37]; P < .001; procedures: 2.0% [95% CI, 1.9%-2.1%] vs 0.7% [95% CI, 0.7%-0.8%]; HR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.79-2.06]; P < .001), while patients who received PHS did not (disorders: 12.4% vs 10.3%; HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.98-1.05]; P = .82; procedures: 1.1% [95% CI, 1.0%-1.3%] vs 0.7% [95% CI, 0.7%-0.8%]; HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.96-1.29]; P = .15). Common procedures included colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and rectal resection.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with PCa receiving RT, those receiving a PHS had a significantly lower incidence of all-cause bowel disorders and related procedures compared with patients who did not receive a PHS over the 4-year follow-up. The incidence among patients with PHS was similar to the general population. These findings are consistent with prior phase 3 trial results, where patients receiving PHS experienced no decline in bowel quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Yu reported personal fees from Boston Scientific and grants from Pfizer/Myovant outside the submitted work. Dr Hamstra reported personal fees from Boston Scientific (consultant) during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Cumulative Incidence of Bowel Disorders and Related Procedures
HR indicates hazard ratio; PHS, polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel spacer; RT, radiotherapy.

References

    1. American Cancer Society . Key statistics for prostate cancer. 2024; Accessed May 17, 2024. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/prostate-cancer/about/key-statistics...
    1. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12-49. doi:10.3322/caac.21820 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bekelman JE, Rumble RB, Chen RC, et al. . Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of an American Urological Association/American Society for Radiation Oncology/Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(32):3251-3258. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.00606 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schaeffer EM, Srinivas S, Adra N, et al. . Prostate Cancer, Version 4.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023;21(10):1067-1096. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2023.0050 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee JY, Cho KS, Kwon JK, et al. . A competing risk analysis of cancer-specific mortality of initial treatment with radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy in clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(12):4026-4033. doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3780-9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types