Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 11;135(9):e187063.
doi: 10.1172/JCI187063. eCollection 2025 May 1.

Activin A activation of Smad3 mitigates innate inflammation in mouse models of psoriasis and sepsis

Affiliations

Activin A activation of Smad3 mitigates innate inflammation in mouse models of psoriasis and sepsis

Thierry Gauthier et al. J Clin Invest. .

Abstract

Phosphorylation of Smad3 is a critical mediator of TGF-β signaling, which plays an important role in regulating innate immune responses. However, whether Smad3 activation can be regulated in innate immune cells in TGF-β-independent contexts remains poorly understood. Here, we show that Smad3 is activated through the phosphorylation of its C-terminal residues (pSmad3C) in murine and human macrophages in response to bacterial and viral ligands, and this activation is mediated by activin A in a TGF-β-independent manner. Specifically, infectious ligands, such as LPS, induced secretion of activin A through the transcription factor STAT5 in macrophages, and activin A signaling in turn activated pSmad3C. This activin A/Smad3 axis controlled mitochondrial ATP production and ATP conversion into adenosine by CD73 in macrophages, enforcing an antiinflammatory mechanism. Consequently, mice with a deletion of activin A receptor 1b specifically in macrophages (Acvr1bfl/fl-Lyz2cre) succumbed more to sepsis as a result of uncontrolled inflammation and exhibited exacerbated skin disease in a mouse model of imiquimod-induced psoriasis. Thus, we have revealed a previously unrecognized natural brake to inflammation in macrophages that occurs through the activation of Smad3 in an activin A-dependent manner.

Keywords: Cytokines; Immunology; Inflammation; Innate immunity; Macrophages.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. LPS activates Smad3 in a TGF-β–independent manner.
(A) Abundance of the indicated proteins in macrophages treated with 10 ng/mL of LPS for the indicated times. (B) Abundance of the indicated proteins in macrophages pretreated with cycloheximide for 1 hour followed by LPS stimulation for 6 hours. (C) Abundance of the indicated proteins in macrophages pretreated with an anti–TGF-β blocking antibody for 1 hour followed by LPS or TGF-β (5 ng/mL) stimulation for 6 hours. (D) Abundance of the indicated proteins in macrophages isolated from WT or RI-Lyz2cre mice and stimulated by LPS or TGF-β for 6 hours. (E) Abundance of the indicated proteins in peritoneal cells of mice injected i.p. with LPS and harvested 6 hours after injection. Each band represents a mouse. (F) Flow cytometry analysis of phosphorylated Smad2/3 (pSmad2/3) levels in peritoneal cells from mice injected i.p. with LPS and harvested 6 hours after injection. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; M, macrophages; N, neutrophils; DC, dendritic cells; B, B cells; T, T cells. (n = 9.) (G) Flow cytometry analysis of pSmad2/3 levels in macrophages from WT or RI-Lyz2cre mice injected i.p. with LPS and harvested 6 hours after injection. Red, isotype control; orange, WT; blue, WT LPS; green, RI-Lyz2cre LPS. (H) Abundance of the indicated proteins in peritoneal cells of mice subjected to CLP surgery (or sham surgery) and harvested 6 hours after injection. Each band represents a mouse. (I) Flow cytometry analysis of pSmad2/3 levels in macrophages from WT or RI-Lyz2cre mice subjected to CLP surgery (or sham surgery) and harvested 6 hours after injection. Red, isotype control; green, WT; blue, WT LPS; orange, RI-Lyz2cre LPS. Representative or pooled from at least 2 independent experiments. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA.
Figure 2
Figure 2. LPS phosphorylates Smad3 in an activin A–dependent manner.
(A) RT-qPCR analysis in macrophages stimulated by LPS. (n = 4–6.) (B) Activin A levels (measured by ELISA) in the supernatant of macrophages stimulated by LPS. (C) Abundance of the indicated proteins in macrophages stimulated by LPS for 6 hours. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of INHBA expression in human macrophages stimulated by LPS for 6 hours. (n = 4.) (E) Abundance of the indicated proteins in human macrophages pretreated with follistatin or an anti–activin A or anti–TGF-β blocking antibody for 1 hour followed by LPS stimulation for 6 hours. (FG) Activin A levels in serum of WT mice injected with LPS (F) or subjected to CLP surgery (G) and harvested after 6 hours. (n = 6–10.) (HI) Flow cytometry analysis of pSmad2/3 levels in macrophages from WT or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice injected i.p. with LPS (H) or subjected to CLP surgery (I) and harvested after 6 hours. (J) RT-qPCR analysis of the indicated genes in macrophages stimulated or not by LPS for 24 hours. (n = 4–6.) (K) RT-qPCR analysis of macrophages stimulated or not by LPS for 24 hours. (n = 4.) (L) RT-qPCR analysis of IL6 expression in human macrophages pretreated with follistatin or an anti–activin A blocking antibody for 1 hour followed by LPS stimulation for 24 hours. (n = 4.) (M) RT-qPCR analysis of IL6 expression in human macrophages pretreated with a Smad3 inhibitor (SMAD3i) for 1 hour followed by LPS stimulation for 24 hours. (n = 4.) (N) RT-qPCR analysis in macrophages stimulated by LPS for 24 hours in the presence of activin A. (n = 6.) Representative or pooled from at least 2 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001 by Student’s t test (A, B, D, F, G, and N) or 1-way ANOVA (HM).
Figure 3
Figure 3. LPS induces the activin A/Smad3 axis through a TLR4/MyD88/MAPK/STAT5 pathway.
(A) RT-qPCR analysis of Inhba expression in macrophages from WT or TLR4-KO mice stimulated 2 hours by LPS. (n = 6.) (B) RT-qPCR analysis of Inhba expression in macrophages from WT or MyD88-KO mice stimulated 2 hours by LPS. (n = 4.) (C) Protein abundance in macrophages stimulated 6 hours by LPS. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of Inhba expression in macrophages from WT or Traf6-Lyz2cre mice stimulated by LPS for 2 hours. (n = 6.) (E) Protein abundance in macrophages isolated stimulated 6 hours by LPS. (F) RT-qPCR analysis of Inhba expression in macrophages pretreated with a TAK1 inhibitor for 1 hour followed by LPS stimulation for 2 hours. (n = 6.) (G) Protein abundance in macrophages pretreated with a TAK1 inhibitor for 1 hour followed by LPS stimulation for 6 hours. (H) RT-qPCR analysis of Inhba expression in macrophages pretreated with MEK and ERK inhibitors for 1 hour followed by LPS stimulation for 2 hours. (n = 6.) (I) Protein abundance in macrophages pretreated 1 hour with MEK and ERK inhibitors followed by LPS stimulation for 6 hours. (J) Protein abundance in macrophages treated with LPS. (K) ChIP-coupled real-time PCR analysis of STAT5 enrichment in various sequences of the promoter region of the Inhba gene in macrophages treated with LPS for 2 hours. (n = 6.) (L) RT-qPCR analysis of Inhba expression in macrophages pretreated 1 hour with a STAT5 inhibitor followed by LPS stimulation for 2 hours. (n = 6.) (M) Protein abundance in macrophages pretreated 1 hour with a STAT5 inhibitor followed by LPS stimulation for 6 hours. (N) RT-qPCR analysis of Inhba expression in macrophages from WT or Stat5-Lyz2cre mice stimulated by LPS for 2 hours. (n = 6.) (O) Protein abundance in macrophages stimulated by LPS for 6 hours. Representative of at least 2 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001 by 1-way ANOVA.
Figure 4
Figure 4. The activin A/Smad3 pathway supports ATP metabolism during inflammation.
(A) Heatmap representing significantly downregulated genes in macrophages from Smad3-KO mice (compared with WT macrophages) stimulated with LPS for 24 hours. (B and C) MitoTracker staining in macrophages stimulated with LPS for 24 hours and isolated from Smad3-KO mice (B) or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice (C). (D and E) ATP production (intracellular) in macrophages stimulated with LPS for 24 hours and isolated from Smad3-KO mice (D) (n = 6) or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice (E). (F and G) RT-qPCR analysis of Arg1 and Tgfbi expression in macrophages stimulated with LPS for 24 hours in combination (or not) with 20 μM of ATP and isolated from Smad3-KO mice (F) or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice (G). (H) RT-qPCR analysis of Nt5e (encoding CD73) expression in macrophages stimulated with LPS for 24 hours and isolated from Smad3-KO or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice. (I and J) RT-qPCR analysis of Tgfbi and Arg1 expression in macrophages stimulated with LPS for 24 hours in combination (or not) with ATP and a CD73 inhibitor or a CREB inhibitor and isolated from Smad3-KO mice (I) or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice (J). (FJ, n = 4.) Pooled or representative of at least 2 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001 by Student’s t test (BG) or 1-way ANOVA (HJ).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Activin A signaling in macrophages controls inflammation and survival during sepsis.
(A) Survival of WT or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice injected i.p. with LPS. (n = 8–13.) (B) TNF-α and IL-6 levels in serum of WT or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice injected i.p. or not with LPS for 3 hours. (n = 6–13.) (C) Survival of WT or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice subjected to CLP surgery. (n = 7–11.) (D) TNF-α and IL-6 levels in serum of WT or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice subjected to CLP surgery. (n = 8–12.) Pooled from at least 2 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.001 by log-rank (Mantel-Cox test, A and C) and Student’s t test (B and D).
Figure 6
Figure 6. The activin A/Smad3 axis regulates inflammation during psoriasis.
(A) RT-qPCR analysis of Inhba expression in macrophages pretreated for 1 hour with the indicated inhibitors and stimulated with imiquimod (IMQ) for 2 hours. (n = 4–6.) (B) Abundance of the indicated proteins in macrophages isolated from WT or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice (KO) and stimulated with IMQ for 6 hours. (C) RT-qPCR analysis of INHBA expression in human monocytes stimulated with IMQ for 2 hours. (n = 4.) (D) Abundance of the indicated proteins in human monocytes pretreated with follistatin or an anti–activin A or anti–TGF-β blocking antibody for 1 hour followed by IMQ stimulation for 6 hours. (E) RT-qPCR analysis of the indicated genes in macrophages from WT or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice stimulated or not with IMQ for 24 hours. (n = 4.) (F) RT-qPCR analysis of the indicated genes in macrophages from WT or Smad3-KO mice stimulated or not with IMQ for 24 hours. (n = 4.) (G) RT-qPCR analysis of Inhba expression in skin of WT mice treated with an IMQ topical application for 6 hours. (n = 10.) (H) Abundance of the indicated proteins in skin of WT mice treated with an IMQ topical application for 6 hours. Each band represents a mouse. Macrophages from WT or Smad3-KO macrophages were transferred intradermally in skin of CD45.1 WT mice followed by IMQ topical application for 6 consecutive days. Mice were then harvested and analyzed. (I) Skin thickness. (n = 15.) (J) TCRγδ cytokine production in skin. (n = 15.) WT or Acvr1b-Lyz2cre mice were treated with IMQ topical application for 6 consecutive days, then harvested and analyzed. (K) Skin thickness. (L) Macrophage frequency in skin. (M) Production of cytokines by macrophages. (N) TCRγδ cytokine production in skin. (KN, n = 8–9.) Representative or pooled from at least 2 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001 by Student’s t test (C and GN) or 1-way ANOVA (A, E, and F).

References

    1. Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(11):723–737. doi: 10.1038/nri3073. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park MD, et al. Macrophages in health and disease. Cell. 2022;185(23):4259–4279. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.10.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watanabe S, et al. The role of macrophages in the resolution of inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(7):2619–2628. doi: 10.1172/JCI124615. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin-Rodriguez O, et al. Pro-resolving factors released by macrophages after efferocytosis promote mucosal wound healing in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Immunol. 2021;12:754475. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.754475. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016;44(3):450–462. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms