Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for optic nerve sheath meningioma: comparison of efficacy and costs with radiotherapy under Korean health insurance system
- PMID: 40069531
- PMCID: PMC12106137
- DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-04986-2
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for optic nerve sheath meningioma: comparison of efficacy and costs with radiotherapy under Korean health insurance system
Abstract
Purpose: To survey the real-world effectiveness and cost of optic nerve sheath meningioma (ONSM) treating with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS), and compare with the external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).
Methods: Retrospective, comparative study that included patients with primary ONSM treated with either GKRS or EBRT in Samsung Medical Center, Korea. The treatment response, and treatment costs were compared between GKRS and EBRT groups.
Results: There were 34 adult patients with primary ONSM treated with either GKRS (n = 25) or EBRT (n = 9) (follow-up period: 6-207 months). The local tumor control rates (GKRS: 92%; EBRT: 100%; P = 1) and vision preservation rates (GKRS: 64%; EBRT: 67%; P = 1) were similar in both groups. The mean gross tumor volume (GTV) decreased by 21.4 ± 19.7% after GKRS and 26.4 ± 18.7% after EBRT (P = 0.4803). The complication rates did not differ between two modalities. Factors associated with better visual outcomes were pretreatment BCVA > 20/50 (odds ratio: 6.000, P = 0.0234) and the absence of intracranial tumor extension (odds ratio: 30.00, P = 0.0001). GKRS reduced the total costs of care by 43% under Korean National Health Insurance System (NHIS).
Conclusion: This study revealed that GKRS and EBRT had similar treatment efficacy and safety profile in treating ONSMs. Instant management is advantageous when the BCVA deteriorates to 20/50 and tumors involve intracranially. Under the framework of Korean NHIS, GKRS contributed to less indirect cost estimates and was preferred by patients under shared decision-making process.
Keywords: Direct medical cost; Gamma Knife Radiosurgery; Indirect cost estimates; Optic nerve sheath meningioma.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures


References
-
- Wright JE (1977) Primary optic nerve meningiomas: clinical presentation and management. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 83(4 Pt 1):617–625 - PubMed
-
- Dutton JJ (1992) Optic nerve sheath meningiomas. Surv Ophthalmol 37(3):167–183 - PubMed
-
- Saeed P et al (2003) Optic nerve sheath meningiomas. Ophthalmology 110(10):2019–2030 - PubMed
-
- Turbin RE et al (2002) A long-term visual outcome comparison in patients with optic nerve sheath meningioma managed with observation, surgery, radiotherapy, or surgery and radiotherapy. Ophthalmology 109(5):p890–p899 - PubMed
-
- Pandit R et al (2019) Long-term efficacy of fractionated conformal radiotherapy for the management of primary optic nerve sheath meningioma. Br J Ophthalmol 103(10):1436–1440 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources