Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jul;39(5):405-416.
doi: 10.1111/ppe.13178. Epub 2025 Mar 11.

Evaluating Perinatal Health in Europe: A Comparison of Routine Population Birth Data Sources

Marianne Philibert  1 , Mika Gissler  2   3 , Oscar Zurriaga  4   5 , Serena Donati  6 , Zeljka Drausnik  7 , Günther Heller  8 , Alison Macfarlane  9 , Ashna Mohangoo  10 , Luule Sakkeus  11 , Vlad Tica  12 , Petr Velebil  13 , Jeannette Klimont  14 , Lisa Broeders  15 , Tonia A Rihs  16 , Jennifer Zeitlin  1 ; Euro‐Peristat Research Group
Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluating Perinatal Health in Europe: A Comparison of Routine Population Birth Data Sources

Marianne Philibert et al. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Background: International comparisons of population birth data provide essential benchmarks for evaluating perinatal health policies.

Objectives: This study aimed to describe routine national data sources in Europe by their ability to provide core perinatal health indicators.

Methods: The Euro-Peristat Network collected routine national data on a recommended set of core indicators from 2015 to 2021 using a federated protocol based on a common data model with 16 data items. Data providers completed an online questionnaire to describe the sources used in each country. We classified countries by the number of data items they provided (all 16, 15-14, < 14).

Results: A total of 29 out of the 31 countries that provided data responded to the survey. Routine data sources included birth certificates (15 countries), electronic medical records (EMR) from delivery hospitalisations (16 countries), direct entry by health providers (9 countries), EMR from other care providers (7 countries) and Hospital Discharge Summaries (7 countries). Completeness of population coverage was at least 98%, with 17 countries reporting 100%. These databases most often included mothers giving birth in the national territory, regardless of nationality or place of residence (24 countries), whereas others register births to residents only. In 20 countries, routine sources were linked, including linkage between birth and death certificates (16 countries). Countries providing all 16 items (n = 8) were more likely to use EMRs from delivery hospitalisations (100%) compared to 50% and 11% in countries with 15-14 items (n = 12) and < 14 items (n = 9), respectively. Linkage was also more common in these countries (100%) versus 75% and 56%, respectively. Other data source characteristics did not differ by the ability to provide data on core perinatal indicators.

Conclusions: There are wide differences between countries in the data sources used to construct perinatal health indicators in Europe. Countries using EMR linking to other sources had the best data availability.

Keywords: Europe; birth data; international comparisons; perinatal indicators; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Countries participating in the Euro‐Peristat data collection and number of data items provided, out of a maximum of 16. NB: Wales provides data alone and as part of Office of National Statistics data which covers England and Wales. Romania, Slovakia and Wales did not participate in the survey on data sources.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Zeitlin J., Blondel B., and Khoshnood B., “Fertility, Pregnancy and Childbirth,” in Successes and Failures of Health Policy in Europe Over Four Decades: Diverging Trends, Converging Challenges. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, ed. Mackenbach J. M. M. (Berkshire, England: Open University Press McGraw‐Hill, 2013).
    1. Blondel B., Cuttini M., Hindori‐Mohangoo A. D., et al., “How Do Late Terminations of Pregnancy Affect Comparisons of Stillbirth Rates in Europe? Analyses of Aggregated Routine Data From the Euro‐Peristat Project,” British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 125, no. 2 (2018): 226–234, 10.1111/1471-0528.14767. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeitlin J., Mortensen L., Cuttini M., et al., “Declines in Stillbirth and Neonatal Mortality Rates in Europe Between 2004 and 2010: Results From the Euro‐Peristat Project,” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 70, no. 6 (2016): 609–615, 10.1136/jech-2015-207013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diguisto C., Saucedo M., Kallianidis A., et al., “Maternal Mortality in Eight European Countries With Enhanced Surveillance Systems: Descriptive Population Based Study,” British Medical Journal 379 (2022): e070621, 10.1136/bmj-2022-070621. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Helenius K., Sjors G., Shah P. S., et al., “Survival in Very Preterm Infants: An International Comparison of 10 National Neonatal Networks,” Pediatrics 140, no. 6 (2017): e20171264, 10.1542/peds.2017-1264. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources