Infectious Causes of Stillbirths: A Descriptive Etiological Study in Uganda
- PMID: 40070697
- PMCID: PMC11891129
- DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae606
Infectious Causes of Stillbirths: A Descriptive Etiological Study in Uganda
Abstract
Background: Every year an estimated 2-3 million babies are stillborn, with a high burden in Africa. Infection is an important driver of stillbirth. There is a lack of data on the bacterial causes of stillbirth in Uganda, contributing to a lack of interventions such as effective prophylaxis and development of maternal vaccine options against the most implicated pathogens.
Methods: The PROGRESS study was an observational cohort study undertaken in Kampala, Uganda, between November 2018 and April 2021. If a woman delivered a stillborn baby, consent was sought for the collection of a heart-blood aspirate. One to three mL of blood was collected and sent for culture using the BD Bactec blood culture system. Organism identification was performed using biochemical testing and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Susceptibilities to appropriate panels of antimicrobials were determined by agar dilution.
Results: Kawempe Hospital registered 34 517 births in the study period, of which 1717 (5.0%) were stillbirths. A total of 581 (33.8%) were recruited into the study, and heart blood aspirates were performed on 569 (97.9%). Blood samples were sufficient for analysis of 476, with a total of 108 positive cultures (22.7% of sampled stillbirths). Fifty-nine of 108 blood cultures contained organisms that were considered potential pathogens, giving a pathogen positivity rate of 12.4%. Common pathogens included Enterococcus spp. (n = 14), Escherichia coli (n = 13), viridans streptococci (n = 18), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 6), and group B Streptococcus (n = 5). Gram-negative organisms were frequently resistant to commonly used first-line antimicrobials.
Conclusions: The high proportion of stillbirths caused by likely pathogenic bacteria in Uganda highlights the potential for prevention with prophylaxis and stresses the need for further investment in this area.
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; infection; pregnancy; sepsis; stillbirth.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential conflicts of interest. O.B.S. received contributions from the UK Health Security Agency in the form of salary payments for research staff employed at Cardiff University specifically to carry out this work. K.L.D. received funding for research at the Institute for Infection and Immunity at St George's, University of London, from Pfizer and MinervaX for work that is unrelated to this manuscript. She has received no personal funds. All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2016; 4:e98–108. - PubMed
-
- UNICEF . A Neglected Tragedy. The Global Burden of Stillbirths. Report of the UN Inter-agency Group. UNICEF; 2020.
-
- Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet 2016; 387:587–603. - PubMed
-
- NIRH . NIHR Global Health Research Group on Stillbirth Prevention and Management in Sub-Saharan Africa. NIHR; 2021.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous