Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 10;11(2):00626-2024.
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00626-2024. eCollection 2025 Mar.

The impact of COPD-bronchiectasis association on clinical outcomes: insights from East Asian cohorts validating the ROSE criteria

Affiliations

The impact of COPD-bronchiectasis association on clinical outcomes: insights from East Asian cohorts validating the ROSE criteria

Yen-Fu Chen et al. ERJ Open Res. .

Abstract

Background: The radiology, obstruction, symptoms and exposure (ROSE) criteria provide a standardised approach for identifying the "COPD-bronchiectasis (BE) association." However, the clinical implications and outcomes of the COPD-BE association in East Asian populations remain unclear. Our study applied the ROSE criteria to assess the prevalence, clinical impact and outcomes of the COPD-BE association in an East Asian cohort, and compared that cohort with nonsmoking BE patients with fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) and those without FAO.

Methods: An integrated cohort analysis was conducted within a Taiwanese demographic, combining a prospective cohort of 147 participants with a multicentre retrospective cohort of 574 participants. Stratification was based on the ROSE criteria, distinguishing between nonsmoking BE, smoking BE, nonsmoking BE with FAO and BE in compliance with the ROSE criteria. Clinical, radiological and spirometric variables were assessed in conjunction with outcomes to validate the diagnostic utility of the criteria.

Results: Using the ROSE criteria, we found that 16.5% of participants had a COPD-BE association (22.4% in the prospective cohort and 14.9% in the retrospective cohort), predominantly in older male patients. These patients had escalated dyspnoea scores, higher COPD diagnosis rates and increased use of inhalation therapies, compared with those without FAO. Notably, patients with a COPD-BE association and nonsmoking BE with FAO displayed similar clinical symptoms, pulmonary function and disease severity, but differed slightly in airway microbiology. Furthermore, patients with a COPD-BE association had significantly higher risks of exacerbations and hospitalisations, even after adjusting for confounding factors, which highlights that they have poorer clinical outcomes than other groups.

Conclusion: The ROSE criteria effectively identify the COPD-BE association in East Asian populations, highlighting a significant future exacerbation risk compared with other BE groups. Future research is warranted to better understand BE progression, especially in FAO subgroups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The flow of patients recruited to: a) the prospective cohort and b) the retrospective cohort. HRCT: high-resolution computed tomography; ABPA: allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; BAL: bronchoalveolar lavage; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; BE: bronchiectasis; BE-FAO: bronchiectasis with fixed airflow obstruction; PY: pack-years, ROSE: radiological bronchiectasis, obstruction defined by a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.7, symptoms and exposure to a minimum of 10 pack-years of smoking; TBARC: Taiwan Bronchiectasis Research Collaboration.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
In the prospective cohort, a) the Kaplan–Meier plot illustrates the time to the first exacerbation among different bronchiectasis subgroups with a median follow-up of 2.8 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.6–4.2 years). The plot compares four groups: nonsmoking bronchiectasis (BE), smoking BE, nonsmoking BE with fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) and COPD–BE association. b) The Kaplan–Meier plot illustrates the time to first hospitalisation among different bronchiectasis subgroups with a median follow-up of 2.8 years (IQR 1.6–4.2 years). The groups analysed were nonsmoking BE, smoking BE, nonsmoking BE with FAO and COPD–BE association. *: p<0.05.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for the risk of exacerbation of bronchiectasis (BE) among the four subgroups in: a) the prospective cohort and b) the retrospective cohort. Nonsmoking BE was used as the reference group (IRR 1.0). The IRR values for the other subgroups, compared with the nonsmoking BE subgroup, are as follows. Prospective cohort: smoking BE, IRR 1.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55–2.37; p=0.709); nonsmoking BE with FAO, IRR 2.37 (95% CI 1.42–3.95; p=0.001); and COPD–BE association, IRR 3.68 (95% CI 2.32–5.86; p<0.001). Retrospective cohort: smoking BE, IRR 0.88 (95% CI 0.51–1.53; p=0.667); nonsmoking BE with FAO, IRR 1.83 (95% CI 1.21–2.76; p=0.004); and COPD–BE association, IRR 2.04 (95% CI 1.33–3.31; p=0.004).

References

    1. Flume PA, Chalmers JD, Olivier KN. Advances in bronchiectasis: endotyping, genetics, microbiome, and disease heterogeneity. Lancet 2018; 392: 880–890. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31767-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Polverino E, Goeminne PC, McDonnell MJ,et al. European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of adult bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1700629. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00629-2017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Naidich DP, McCauley DI, Khouri NF, et al. Computed tomography of bronchiectasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982; 6: 437–444. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198206000-00001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agusti A, Celli BR, Criner GJ, et al. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 report: GOLD executive summary. Eur Respir J 2023; 61: 2300239. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00239-2023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pasteur MC, Bilton D, Hill AT, British Thoracic Society Bronchiectasis non-CF Guideline Group . British Thoracic Society guideline for non-CF bronchiectasis. Thorax 2010; 65: Suppl. 1, i1–i58. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136119 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources