Routine anaesthesia ward-based patient visits in surgery: 1-year outcomes of the TRACE randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 40071336
- PMCID: PMC11897594
- DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf019
Routine anaesthesia ward-based patient visits in surgery: 1-year outcomes of the TRACE randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Background: The TRACE (Routine posTsuRgical Anaesthesia visit to improve patient outComE) RCT did not show any perioperative benefit from ward-based visits by anaesthetists after surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of this intervention on longer-term outcomes.
Methods: Patients were followed up in the TRACE RCT to 1 year in nine hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery, and at risk for adverse postoperative outcome, were included. Patients in the intervention group additionally received routine anaesthesia visits on postoperative days 1 and 3. Clinical outcome measures included 1-year mortality, hospital readmission, and reoperation. Functional recovery (FR) was measured using the patient-reported global surgical recovery (GSR) index, ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), and functional recovery index (FRI). Quality of life (QoL) was measured using EQ-5D-5L.
Results: Some 5473 adult patients were followed up. No differences were found between the control and intervention groups for clinical, FR, and QoL outcome measures. One-year mortality was 5.4% in the control group and 5.8% in the intervention group, readmission was 27% and 26% respectively, and reoperation was 20% and 18% respectively. At 1 year, FR and QoL had recovered to preoperative levels. However, 30% of patients were not able to fully perform ADL and 40%-51% of patients still reported a problem in the EQ-5D-5L dimensions mobility, usual activities, and pain/discomfort.
Conclusion: Routine postoperative anaesthesia ward visits of patients did not improve clinical, functional, and QoL outcomes. A substantial proportion of patients still experienced health-related limitations in daily life 1 year after surgery. In conclusion, an early postoperative intervention with postoperative anaesthesia visits in the ward after non-cardiac surgery had no effect on 30-day or 1-year clinical outcome. Remarkably, TRACE shows that compared with data sampled 10 years ago, 1-year mortality has not improved in the Netherlands. At 1 year, functional recovery or QoL showed little improvement compared with baseline. Importantly, a substantial number of patients still reported incomplete recovery and problems that limit QoL, which indicate that there is still room for improvement.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.
Figures
 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                References
- 
    - Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR, Allore H. Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1061–1066 - PubMed
 
- 
    - Wrenn SM, Cepeda-Benito A, Ramos-Valadez DI, Cataldo PA. Patient perceptions and quality of life after colon and rectal surgery: what do patients really want? Dis Colon Rectum 2018;61:971–978 - PubMed
 
- 
    - Sikder T, Sourial N, Maimon G, Tahiri M, Teasdale D, Bergman H et al. Postoperative recovery in frail, pre-frail, and non-frail elderly patients following abdominal surgery. World J Surg 2019;43:415–424 - PubMed
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Medical
 
        