Efficacy and Safety of Chemical Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Spine Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Anticoagulant Types
- PMID: 40071770
- DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001790
Efficacy and Safety of Chemical Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Spine Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing Anticoagulant Types
Abstract
Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: To determine whether venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is necessary after spine trauma and to assess the efficacy and safety profiles of anticoagulation agents.
Summary of background data: Venous stasis, endothelial disruption, hypercoagulability, and orthopedic injury in spine trauma predispose 12%-64% of patients to deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Recent guidelines provide insufficient evidence to support or oppose routine VTE prophylaxis in this population.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to March 2023. Controlled vocabulary, key terms, and synonyms related to spinal trauma and anticoagulation were used. Studies comparing different classes of anticoagulants or anticoagulation versus no anticoagulation were included. Four reviewers independently performed abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction, resolving conflicts by consensus. The primary outcomes were deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleeding, and mortality.
Results: Our search yielded 2948 articles, with 103 advancing to full-text review and 16 meeting inclusion criteria. Bias assessment using MINORS for 10 retrospective studies resulted in an average score of 16.8 ± 1.6, whereas 6 prospective studies had NOS scores >6, indicating high-quality evidence. Anticoagulation was significantly associated with lower odds of DVT (OR: 0.40; P =0.0013), with low heterogeneity (I² = 2%). Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was associated with significantly lower odds of DVT (OR: 0.78; P =0.0050) and PE (OR: 0.66; P =0.0013) compared with unfractionated heparin (UH). No significant difference in major bleeding was found (OR: 0.52; P =0.1397). LMWH was linked to reduced mortality (OR: 0.43; P <0.0001).
Conclusion: Chemical anticoagulants reduce DVT risk in spine trauma patients. LMWH provides superior protection against DVT, pulmonary embolism, and mortality compared with UH, with no significant increase in major bleeding.
Keywords: anticoagulation therapy; spine trauma; thromboembolic complications.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
S.G. reports paid consultancy with Johnson & Johnson and Qmetis. J.P. declares the following affiliations: DePuy Consultant, BrainLab Consultant, ZSFab Consultant, Amplify Speaker, ROMTech Stock. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Hu R, Mustard CA, Burns C. Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21:492–499.
-
- Zileli M, Sharif S, Fornari M. Incidence and epidemiology of thoracolumbar spine fractures: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations. Neurospine. 2021;18:704–712.
-
- Barbiellini Amidei C, Salmaso L, Bellio S, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: a large population-based study. Spinal Cord. 2022;60:812–819.
-
- Katsuura Y, Osborn JM, Cason GW. The epidemiology of thoracolumbar trauma: a meta-analysis. J Orthop. 2016;13:383–388.
-
- Khan M, Jehan F, O’Keeffe T, et al. Optimal timing of initiation of thromboprophylaxis after nonoperative blunt spinal trauma: a propensity-matched analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226:760–768.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials