Perioperative Management During Liver Transplantation: A National Survey From the French Special Interest Group in "Liver Anesthesiology and Intensive Care"
- PMID: 40071909
- DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005264
Perioperative Management During Liver Transplantation: A National Survey From the French Special Interest Group in "Liver Anesthesiology and Intensive Care"
Abstract
Background: Perioperative management practices in liver transplantation (LT) evolve very quickly. There are few specific recommendations, often based on a low level of evidence, resulting in wide heterogeneity of practices.
Methods: We performed a survey in all 16 French centers in 2021 by focusing on center organization, preoperative cardiovascular assessment, antimicrobial prophylaxis, hemostasis management, intraoperative use of hemodynamic monitoring and renal replacement therapy, immunosuppression, and postoperative prevention of arterial complications and compared it with current recommendations.
Results: The organization of perioperative LT care involved 1 single team throughout the perioperative LT process in 7 centers (43.7%). The coronary evaluation was systematic in one-third of the centers and guided by risk factors in the other centers. Antibiotic prophylaxis was strictly intraoperative in only 7 centers (44%). Antifungal prophylaxis targeting high-risk LT recipients was administered in 15 centers (93%). Intraoperative coagulation assessment was based on standard coagulation tests in 8 centers (50%), on viscoelastic assays in 4 centers (25%), and both methods in 4 centers (25%). Hemodynamic monitoring practices greatly varied between centers.Concerning immunosuppression, molecules and dosages were heterogeneous. Aspirin was systematically administered in one-third of cases (6 centers; 37.5%). Of the 21 recommendations tested, the concordance rate was 100% for 3 recommendations and <50% for 7 recommendations.
Conclusions: Our study precisely describes French practices regarding LT in perioperative care and highlights the paucity of data in this setting, leading to very weak recommendations that are poorly followed in LT centers.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Pollok JM, Tinguely P, Berenguer M, et al.; ERAS4OLT.org Collaborative. Enhanced recovery for liver transplantation: recommendations from the 2022 International Liver Transplantation Society consensus conference. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;8:81–94.
-
- Paugam-Burtz C, Chatelon J, Follin A, et al. Perioperative anaesthetic practices in liver transplantation in France: evolution between 2004 and 2008. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2010;29:419–424.
-
- French Biomedicine Agency. French transplantation agency medical report. Available at https://rams.agence-biomedecine.fr/greffe-hepatique-0 . Accessed September 4, 2024.
-
- Bagshaw SM, Darmon M, Ostermann M, et al. Current state of the art for renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:841–854.
-
- Gavaldà J, Meije Y, Fortún J, et al.; ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts. Invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(Suppl 7):27–48.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical