A hands-free wearable electrolarynx for communication in tracheostomized mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a case series
- PMID: 40072564
- DOI: 10.1007/s00540-025-03481-2
A hands-free wearable electrolarynx for communication in tracheostomized mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a case series
Abstract
The electrolarynx facilitates communication for tracheostomized mechanically ventilated patients. However, its effectiveness is often constrained by patient weakness. A hands-free electrolarynx offers a potential solution, enabling speech without the need to hold the device. This case series evaluated speech intelligibility with a hands-free electrolarynx in tracheostomized, mechanically ventilated patients. Seven tracheostomized patients were enrolled and instructed to use both the conventional and hands-free electrolarynxes. Speech intelligibility was assessed using the 5-point electrolarynx effectivity score (EES). Patients who scored ≥4 were defined as effective users. The median EES (interquartile range [IQR]) for the hands-free electrolarynx was 3.5 (2.5-4), with three effective users (42.9%). The median EES for the conventional electrolarynx when operated by the research staff was 4 (IQR: 3-4), with four effective users (57.1%), indicating no significant difference compared with the hands-free electrolarynx (p=0.7). However, none of the patients were able to effectively and independently utilize the conventional device, leading to a significantly lower median EES of 2 (IQR: 2-2.6; p = 0.03). The hands-free electrolarynx achieves greater intelligibility than the conventional electrolarynx when used independently by patients. The hands-free electrolarynx has the potential to minimize the need for external assistance and enhance autonomous communication.
Keywords: Communication tools; Electrolarynx; Intensive care; Mechanical ventilation; Tracheostomy.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Comment in
-
Letter to the article by Sato et al.J Anesth. 2025 Apr 13. doi: 10.1007/s00540-025-03501-1. Online ahead of print. J Anesth. 2025. PMID: 40221948 No abstract available.
References
-
- Kaye R, Tang CG, Sinclair CF. The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Med Devices. 2017;10:133–40. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S133225 . - DOI
-
- Holm A, Viftrup A, Karlsson V, Nikolajsen L, Dreyer P. Nurses’ communication with mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: umbrella review. J Adv Nurs. 2020;76:2909–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14524 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ten Hoorn S, Elbers PW, Girbes AR, Tuinman PR. Communicating with conscious and mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2016;20:333. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1483-2 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Rose L, Istanboulian L, Smith OM, Silencieux S, Cuthbertson BH, Amaral ACKB, Fraser I, Grey J, Dale C. Feasibility of the electrolarynx for enabling communication in the chronically critically ill: the EECCHO study. J Crit Care. 2018;47:109–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.06.013 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Takeuchi M, Ahn J, Lee K, Takaki K, Ifukube T, Yabu KI, Takamichi S, Ueha R, Sekino M. Hands-free wearable electrolarynx using linear predictive coding residual waves and listening evaluation. Adv Biomed Eng. 2022;11:68–75. https://doi.org/10.14326/abe.11.68 . - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources