Immune suppression sustained allograft acceptance requires PD1 inhibition of CD8+ T cells
- PMID: 40073258
- PMCID: PMC11904129
- DOI: 10.1093/jimmun/vkae007
Immune suppression sustained allograft acceptance requires PD1 inhibition of CD8+ T cells
Abstract
Organ transplant recipients require continual immune-suppressive therapies to sustain allograft acceptance. Although medication nonadherence is a major cause of rejection, the mechanisms responsible for graft loss in this clinically relevant context among individuals with preceding graft acceptance remain uncertain. Here, we demonstrate that skin allograft acceptance in mice maintained with clinically relevant immune-suppressive therapies, tacrolimus and mycophenolate, sensitizes hypofunctional PD1hi graft-specific CD8+ T cells. Uninterrupted immune-suppressive therapy is required because drug discontinuation triggers allograft rejection, replicating the requirement for immune-suppressive therapy adherence in transplant recipients. Graft-specific CD8+ T cells in allograft-accepted mice show diminished effector differentiation and cytokine production, with reciprocally increased PD1 expression. Allograft acceptance-induced PD1 expression is essential, as PDL1 blockade reinvigorates graft-specific CD8+ T cell activation with ensuing allograft rejection despite continual immune-suppressive therapy. Thus, PD1 sustained CD8+ T cell inhibition is essential for allograft acceptance maintained by tacrolimus plus mycophenolate. This necessity for PD1 in sustaining allograft acceptance explains the high rates of rejection in transplant recipients with cancer administered immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD1/PDL1, highlighting shared immune suppression pathways exploited by tumor cells and current therapies for averting allograft rejection.
Keywords: T cells (cells); costimulation (processes); rodent (animal); transplantation (processes).
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The American Association of Immunologists. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
References
-
- 2024. https://unos.org/data/. United Network for Organ Sharing, USA.
-
- Dobbels F, De Geest S, van Cleemput J, Droogne W, and Vanhaecke J. 2004. Effect of late medication non-compliance on outcome after heart transplantation: a 5-year follow-up. J Heart Lung Transplant 23: 1245–1251. - PubMed
-
- Kuypers DRJ 2020. From Nonadherence to Adherence. Transplantation 104: 1330–1340. - PubMed
-
- Vlaminck H, Maes B, Evers G, Verbeke G, Lerut E, Van Damme B, and Vanrenterghem Y. 2004. Prospective study on late consequences of subclinical non-compliance with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant patients. Am J Transplant 4: 1509–1513. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- T32 DK007727/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- University of Cincinnati Center for Clinical and Translational Science
- R01 AI184537/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- American Society of Transplantation
- R01 AI164716/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- R01AI184537/National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
- March of Dimes Foundation Ohio Collaborative for Prematurity Research
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Internal Medicine Scholarly Training for Academic Research
- DP1 AI131080/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- T32 AI165396/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United States
- Burroughs Wellcome Fund Investigator in Infectious Disease
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
