Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 24;17(5):762.
doi: 10.3390/cancers17050762.

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as an Early Predictive Factor of Local and Overall Response to Treatment with Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Radiotherapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as an Early Predictive Factor of Local and Overall Response to Treatment with Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Radiotherapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Victor Duque-Santana et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To analyze the predictive value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radiotherapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods: Retrospective study of patients with high-risk, very high-risk, or unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa who received RT and ADT between 2008 and 2019 and underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging mpMRI) at 6 months post-RT. Differences in ADC values were compared between patients with and without progression and/or local recurrence. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to obtain ADC cutoffs for predicting 10-year progression-free-survival (PFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Results: We evaluated 98 patients (73 [74.5%] high-risk). Over a mean ± SD follow-up of 95.36 ± 30.54 months, 19 patients (19.4%) progressed; at 10 years, PFS was 75.6%, LRFS 93.8%, metastasis-free survival 85.5%, and overall survival 89.5%. Post-RT ADC was significantly lower in patients with local recurrence (1.09 ± 0.18 vs. 1.30 ± 0.20 × 10-3 mm2/s, p = 0.020) and progression (1.23 ± 0.20 vs. 1.30 ± 0.21 × 10-3 mm2/s, p = 0.004). ROC analysis identified a post-RT ADC cutoff of 1.11 × 10-3 mm2/s for local recurrence (area under curve [AUC] 0.843, sensitivity 89.4%, positive predictive value [PPV] 98.8%). The cutoff for progression was 1.24 × 10-3 mm2/s (AUC0.705, sensitivity 72.2%, PPV87.7%). Patients with a post-RT ADC value below and above 1.11 × 10-3 mm2/shad a 10-year LRFS of 66.8% and 97.7%, respectively (HR: 25.04 [2.58-242.92], p < 0.001). The corresponding rates for 10-year PFS were 58.6% and 85.6% in patients with post-RT ADC values below and above 1.24 × 10-3 mm2/s (HR: 2.916 [1.113-7.644], p = 0.015). In the multivariate analysis, a post-treatment ADC value ≤ 1.24 × 10-3 mm2/s was a significant prognostic factor for a lower PFS (HR: 3823 [1371-10,657], p = 0.010). Conclusions: This is the first study to show that post-RT ADC can be a predictive factor of local recurrence in PCa treated with RT and ADT. Moreover, this long-term study demonstrates its value as a predictive factor of progression in PCa treated with RT and ADT.

Keywords: androgen deprivation therapy; apparent diffusion coefficient; multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences in ADC values at diagnosis and post-RT between patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (A,B) and patients with a Gleason score ≤ 7 and ≥8 (C,D).
Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences in ADC values at diagnosis and post-RT between patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (A,B) and patients with a Gleason score ≤ 7 and ≥8 (C,D).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative changes in ADC values from diagnosis to post-RT. The figures show patients with local recurrence (orange) and any form of progression (blue).
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Receiver operating characteristic analysis for local recurrence-free survival. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves for progression-free survival in patients with an ADC value ≤ 1.11 vs. >1.11 × 10−3 mm2/s.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Receiver operating characteristic analysis for progression-free survival. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves for progression-free survival in patients with an ADC value ≤ 1.24 vs. >1.24 × 10−3 mm2/s.

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neal D.E., Metcalfe C., Donovan J.L., Lane J.A., Davis M., Young G.J., Dutton S.J., Walsh E.I., Martin R.M., Peters T.J., et al. ProtecT Study Group. Ten-year Mortality, Disease Progression, and Treatment-related Side Effects in Men with Localised Prostate Cancer from the ProtecT Randomised Controlled Trial According to Treatment Received. Eur. Urol. 2020;77:320–330. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.030. Erratum in Eur. Urol. 2020, 78, e139–e143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chamie K., Sonn G.A., Finley D.S., Tan N., Margolis D.J., Raman S.S., Natarajan S., Huang J., Reiter R.E. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in delineating clinically significant prostate cancer. Urology. 2014;83:369–375. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.09.045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kasivisvanathan V., Rannikko A.S., Borghi M., Panebianco V., Mynderse L.A., Vaarala M.H., Briganti A., Budäus L., Hellawell G., Hindley R.G., et al. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:1767. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duque-Santana V., Diaz-Gavela A., Recio M., Guerrero L.L., Peña M., Sanchez S., López-Campos F., Thuissard I.J., Andreu C., Sanz-Rosa D., et al. Jorge clinical study: 10-year outcomes of risk-adapted radiotherapy defined by multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer. World J. Urol. 2023;41:3829–3838. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04682-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources