Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 4;17(5):899.
doi: 10.3390/nu17050899.

Baby-Led Weaning vs. Traditional Complementary Feeding-Differences in Feeding Practices Among Polish Children Aged 6-36 Months-A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Baby-Led Weaning vs. Traditional Complementary Feeding-Differences in Feeding Practices Among Polish Children Aged 6-36 Months-A Cross-Sectional Study

Agnieszka Białek-Dratwa et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Complementary feeding involves introducing additional foods to a child's diet, influenced by the child's age, developmental stage, and skills, such as sucking, swallowing, and chewing. The WHO and ESPGHAN recommend exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months, with the gradual introduction of complementary foods thereafter. The baby-led weaning (BLW) method emphasises self-feeding and the early introduction of solid foods, fostering independence and development. This study aimed to evaluate the mode of complementary feeding in children aged 6-36 months, considering the BLW method.

Material and method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among the parents of children aged 6-36 months using a Google Forms questionnaire distributed through social media. The study included 1027 participants, with 1017 mother-child pairs meeting the inclusion criteria. The questionnaire covered demographic data, feeding methods, and detailed questions on complementary feeding practices, including BLW. The study included children fed using the baby-led weaning method during supplementary feeding (BLW-baby-led weaning) and children not using the BLW method (NoBLW-no baby-led weaning).

Results: This study found significant differences between the BLW and NoBLW groups in terms of feeding methods and outcomes. BLW children were more often exclusively breastfed (68.9% vs. 58.7%) and started complementary feeding later (79.9% between 6 and 7 months). Adverse events in the BLW group included gagging (64.8%), spitting out food (77.1%), and choking (12.3%), with rare cases requiring medical intervention (0.2%). Children using BLW showed greater autonomy in their eating decisions and had more frequent exposure to varied food textures.

Conclusions: Children using the BLW method were more likely to be breastfed, had more contact with various textures, and were less likely to consume milk formula and pudding-type products. BLW, despite the risk of choking, is safe under supervision and supports motor development and healthy eating habits. The BLW method has the potential to support healthy eating habits and child independence, but its use requires parental education about safety and appropriate food choices. Further research should focus on the long-term effects of this method, especially in terms of its impact on children's eating habits, motor development, and health at an older age.

Keywords: baby-led weaning; children’s diet; complementary feeding; neophobia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.

References

    1. Szajewska H., Socha P., Horvath A., Rybak A., Zalewski B.M., Nehring-Gugulska M., Mojska H., Czerwionka-Szaflarska M., Gajewska D., Helwich E., et al. Zasady żywienia zdrowych niemowląt. Stanowisko Polskiego Towarzystwa Gastroenterologii, Hepatologii i Żywienia Dzieci. Stand. Med. Pediatr. 2021;18:805–822. doi: 10.26625/10130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO Exclusive Breast Feeding for Six Months Best for Babies Everywhere. 2011. [(accessed on 24 March 2020)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2011/breastfeeding_20110...
    1. World Health Organization . Infant and Young Child Feeding: Model Chapter for Textbooks for Medical Students and Allied Health Professionals. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2009. [(accessed on 1 September 2023)]. SESSION 3, Complementary Feeding. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK148957/ - PubMed
    1. Fewtrell M., Bronsky J., Campoy C., Domellöf M., Embleton N., Mis N.F., Hojsak I., Hulst J.M., Indrio F., Lapillonne A., et al. Complementary feeding: A position paper by the European society for paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition (ESPGHAN) committee on nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2017;64:119–132. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001454. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Białek-Dratwa A., Soczewka M., Grajek M., Szczepańska E., Kowalski O. Use of the Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) Method in Complementary Feeding of the Infant—A Cross-Sectional Study of Mothers Using and Not Using the BLW Method. Nutrients. 2022;14:2372. doi: 10.3390/nu14122372. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources