Challenges and opportunities in uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems
- PMID: 40078151
- PMCID: PMC11904623
- DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2024.0232
Challenges and opportunities in uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems
Abstract
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is an essential aspect of computational modelling and statistical prediction. Multiple applications, including geophysics, climate science and aerospace engineering, incorporate UQ in the development and translation of new technologies. In contrast, the application of UQ to biological and healthcare models is understudied and suffers from several critical knowledge gaps. In an era of personalized medicine, patient-specific modelling, and digital twins, a lack of UQ understanding and appropriate implementation of UQ methodology limits the success of modelling and simulation in a clinical setting. The main contribution of our review article is to emphasize the importance and current deficiencies of UQ in the development of computational frameworks for healthcare and biological systems. As the introduction to the special issue on this topic, we provide an overview of UQ methodologies, their applications in non-biological and biological systems and the current gaps and opportunities for UQ development, as later highlighted by authors publishing in the special issue.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 1)'.
Keywords: biology and healthcare; clinical decision support; digital twins; mechanistic models; uncertainty quantification.
Conflict of interest statement
This theme issue was put together by the Guest Editor team under supervision from the journal’s Editorial staff, following the Royal Society’s ethical codes and best-practice guidelines. The Guest Editor team invited contributions and handled the review process. Individual Guest Editors were not involved in assessing papers where they had a personal, professional or financial conflict of interest with the authors or the research described. Independent reviewers assessed all papers. Invitation to contribute did not guarantee inclusion.
Figures


References
-
- Dale KI, Pope ECD, Hopkinson AR, McCaie T, Lowe JA. 2023. Environment-Aware Digital Twins: Incorporating Weather and Climate Information to Support Risk-Based Decision-Making. Artif. Intell. Earth Syst. 2, e230023. (10.1175/aies-d-23-0023.1) - DOI
-
- Williamson D, Blaker AT, Hampton C, Salter J. 2015. Identifying and removing structural biases in climate models with history matching. Clim. Dyn. 45, 1299–1324. (10.1007/s00382-014-2378-z) - DOI
-
- Rougier J. 2007. Probabilistic Inference for Future Climate Using an Ensemble of Climate Model Evaluations. Clim. Chang. 81, 247–264. (10.1007/s10584-006-9156-9) - DOI
-
- Stuckner J, Piekenbrock M, Arnold SM, Ricks TM. 2021. Optimal experimental design with fast neural network surrogate models. Comput. Mater. Sci. 200, 110747. (10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110747) - DOI
-
- Paun LM, et al. . 2024. SECRET: Statistical Emulation for Computational Reverse Engineering and Translation with applications in healthcare. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng 430, 117193. (10.1016/j.cma.2024.117193) - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials