"That's Definitely a Red Flag": Sexual Violence Risk Perception by Men who have Sex with Men Using Dating and Sexual Networking Apps
- PMID: 40078319
- PMCID: PMC11893671
- DOI: 10.1007/s12119-024-10301-4
"That's Definitely a Red Flag": Sexual Violence Risk Perception by Men who have Sex with Men Using Dating and Sexual Networking Apps
Abstract
Sexual violence (SV) victimization is a growing concern for men who have sex with men (MSM), given their high risk for SV relative to heterosexual peers. MSM frequently utilize dating and sexual networking (DSN) apps to meet potential partners, which also puts them at a higher risk of victimization. Understanding the connection between DSN apps and SV victimization for MSM can inform the development of prevention interventions. The aim of this study was to examine partner characteristics MSM perceive as associated with SV risk on DSN apps. We conducted two virtual semi-structured focus groups with 14 MSM between the ages of 18 and 30. Group facilitators queried participants about their experiences with DSN apps and attributes of potentially risky partners. Three levels of perceived SV risk cues emerged as primary themes: yellow flags (attributes used to determine continued engagement), orange flags (caution or warning signs), and red flags (clear indications of danger). MSM described how they use these "flags" to evaluate SV risk when considering whether to interact with potential partners on DSN apps. Future research should assess whether these attributes are indeed associated with SV perpetration and whether strengthening skills for safely navigating DSN app interactions can reduce victimization for MSM.
Keywords: Bisexual men; Dating apps; Gay men; MSM; Men who have sex with men; Sexual violence.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of InterestsThe authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Sexual Violence Risk Perception in Men Who Have Sex With Men: Proposal for the Development and Validation of "G-Date".JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 19;13:e57600. doi: 10.2196/57600. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 39159453 Free PMC article.
-
Geosocial Networking Smartphone App Use and High-Risk Sexual Behaviors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men Attending University in China: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Mar 28;8(3):e31033. doi: 10.2196/31033. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022. PMID: 35343911 Free PMC article.
-
A Study of Intimate Partner Violence, Substance Abuse, and Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex With Men in a Sample of Geosocial-Networking Smartphone Application Users.Am J Mens Health. 2018 Mar;12(2):292-301. doi: 10.1177/1557988316631964. Epub 2016 Feb 12. Am J Mens Health. 2018. PMID: 26873342 Free PMC article.
-
Safe Sex Messages Within Dating and Entertainment Smartphone Apps: A Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Nov 8;4(4):e124. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5760. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016. PMID: 27826133 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of the Internet and mobile-based "apps" for sex-seeking among men who have sex with men in New York City.Am J Mens Health. 2014 Nov;8(6):510-20. doi: 10.1177/1557988314527311. Epub 2014 Mar 20. Am J Mens Health. 2014. PMID: 24658284 Review.
References
-
- Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, P. O., Clinton, A. M., & McAusian, P. (2001). Alcohol and sexual assault. Alcohol Research and Health,25(1), 43–51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4484576/ - PMC - PubMed
-
- Albury, K., & Byron, P. (2016). Safe on my phone? Same-sex attracted young people’s negotiations of intimacy, visibility, and risk on digital hook-up apps. Social Media + Society. 10.1177/2056305116672887
-
- Balsam, K. F., Rothblum, E. D., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2005). Victimization over the life span: A comparison of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual siblings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,73(3), 477–487. 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.477 - PubMed
-
- Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Breiding, M. J., Black, M. C., & Mahendra, R. R. (2014). Sexual violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements, Version 2.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/sv_surveillance_definitionsl-...
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources