Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 12;17(1):e70074.
doi: 10.1002/dad2.70074. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.

The prognosis of mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

The prognosis of mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Simone Salemme et al. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). .

Erratum in

Abstract

Introduction: Knowledge gaps remain about the prognosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Conversion rates to dementia vary widely, and reversion to normal cognition has gained attention. This review updates evidence on MCI conversion risk and probability of stability and reversion.

Methods: We searched databases for studies on MCI prognosis with ≥3 years of follow-up, established criteria for MCI and dementia, and performed a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to assess conversion risk, reversion, and stability probability. Meta-regressions identified sources of heterogeneity and guided subgroup analysis.

Results: From 89 studies (mean follow-up: 5.2 years), conversion risk was 41.5% (38.3%-44.7%) in clinical and 27.0% (22.0%-32.0%) in population-based studies, with Alzheimer's dementia as the most common outcome. Stability rates were 49.3% (clinical) and 49.8% (population). Reversion was 8.7% (clinical) and 28.2% (population).

Discussion: Our findings highlight higher conversion in clinical settings and 30% reversion in population studies, calling for sustainable care pathway development.

Highlights: Prognosis for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) varies by setting; dementia risk is higher and the probability of reversion is lower in clinical-based studies.In both clinical and population settings, cognitive stability is ≈50%.A reorganization of health services could ensure sustainable care for individuals with MCI.Significant heterogeneity in MCI studies impacts data interpretation; follow-up length is crucial.Long-term prognosis studies on MCI in low- and middle-income countries are urgently needed.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; MCI; brain health; cognitive decline; conversion; decentralization; dementia; functional ability; meta‐analysis; primary health care; quality of care; reversion; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

F.T. received honoraria from Biogen for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events. The other authors have no conflicting interests relevant to the manuscript. Author disclosures are available in the Supporting Information.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram. Note: Studies evaluating conversion, stability, and reversion are not mutually exclusive.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
World map of included studies by WHO region. AMR, Region of the Americas; C, number of studies included in the meta‐analysis of the probability of conversion; EUR, European Region; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; R, number of studies included in meta‐analysis of the probability of reversion to normal cognition; S, number of studies included in the meta‐analysis of the probability of cognitive stability; SEAR, South‐East Asia Region; WHO, World Health Organization; WPR, Western Pacific Region. MCI is expressed as the absolute number of individuals with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment at baseline. Note: Studies evaluating conversion, stability, and reversion are not mutually exclusive. Three studies were conducted in geographically mixed cohorts and are not reported in the regional tables.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plot of the probability of conversion to dementia. ES, effect size; weight, inverse‐variance weights obtained from a random‐effects model.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Forest plot of the probability of cognitive stability. ES, effect size; weight, inverse‐variance weights obtained from a random‐effects model.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Forest plot of the probability of reversion to normal cognition. ES, effect size; weight, inverse‐variance weights obtained from a random‐effects model.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Global strategy and action plan on ageing and health. World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY‐NC‐SA 3.0 IGO.
    1. Crook T, Bahar H, Sudilovsky A. Age‐associated memory impairment: diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies. Int J Neurol. 1987;21‐22:73‐82. - PubMed
    1. Smith G, Ivnik RJ, Petersen RC, Malec JF, Kokmen E, Tangalos E. Age‐associated memory impairment diagnoses: problems of reliability and concerns for terminology. Psychol Aging. 1991;6(4):551‐558. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.6.4.551 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levy R. Aging‐associated cognitive decline. Working Party of the International Psychogeriatric Association in collaboration with the World Health Organization. Int Psychogeriatr. 1994;6(1):63‐68. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM–5. 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Association; 2013.

LinkOut - more resources