Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb;18(2):E61-E79.

The Efficacy of Complementary and Alternative Medicines in Medical Dermatology: A Comprehensive Review

Affiliations
Review

The Efficacy of Complementary and Alternative Medicines in Medical Dermatology: A Comprehensive Review

Promise Ufomadu et al. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background: In recent years, there has been a widespread patient use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) for dermatological application, despite few RCT-level studies on these supplements. This creates a barrier for dermatologists and others in counseling patients who may be using or might be tempted to use these CAM agents. This review investigates various CAM modalities used by patients for medical dermatology, exploring their efficacy and toxicity profiles.

Methods: A comprehensive review was performed on the effectiveness of several CAMs utilized in medical dermatology by patients. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane.

Results: Most CAM modalities had statistically insignificant results, and for agents that had significant results in efficacy, these studies were questionable with flawed designs and methodologies.

Conclusion: These CAM supplements have promising potential in dermatologic use and are deserving of further investigation in well-crafted RCT-level studies. A more practical focus in future studies should involve a comparison of CAM agents to conventional therapies either alone or in an integrative fashion. This would accurately represent how these agents will be used clinically by actual patients and will be more helpful to clinicians. In the meantime, dermatologists should be aware of bias in published studies demonstrating the effectiveness of certain CAM modalities, and their corresponding toxicity. By doing so, physicians act as a valuable resource to patients who would like to explore various CAM products, better guiding patient interactions and treatment with improved patient outcomes.

Keywords: Complementary and alternative medicines; acne; atopic dermatitis; integrative dermatology; papulosquamous diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURES: The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article.

Similar articles

References

    1. Fan KW. National center for complementary and alternative medicine website. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005;93(3):410–412.
    1. Tindle HA, Davis RB, Phillips RS et al. Trends in use of complementary and alternative medicine by US adults: 1997–2002. Altern Ther Health Med. 2005;11(1):42–49. - PubMed
    1. Wootton JC, Sparber A. Surveys of complementary and alternative medicine: part I. General trends and demographic groups. J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7(2):195–208. - PubMed
    1. Ernst E. The usage of complementary therapies by dermatological patients: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2000;142(5):857–861. - PubMed
    1. Fuhrmann T, Smith N, Tausk F. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among adults with skin disease: updated results from a national survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63(6):1000–1005. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources