Pharmacodynamic assessment of apramycin against Mycobacterium abscessus in a hollow fibre infection model
- PMID: 40079270
- DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaf073
Pharmacodynamic assessment of apramycin against Mycobacterium abscessus in a hollow fibre infection model
Abstract
Background: Mycobacterium abscessus is an important cause of pulmonary infections, particularly among people with cystic fibrosis. Current treatment options for M. abscessus are suboptimal. Apramycin is a promising alternative aminoglycoside for M. abscessus, in part due to its ability to avoid intrinsic aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes in this pathogen.
Objectives: Define the pharmacodynamic activity of apramycin doses against M. abscessus.
Methods: Apramycin and amikacin pharmacodynamics were assessed against two amikacin-susceptible M. abscessus subsp. abscessus isolates (ATCC 19977 and NR-44261) using a 14-day hollow fibre infection model (HFIM). Viable bacterial counts were determined during exposure to amikacin (15-20 mg/kg q24h) and 3 fractionated doses of apramycin (15 mg/kg q12h, 30 mg/kg q24h, 60 mg/kg q48h) using pharmacokinetic profiles predicted in epithelial lining fluid.
Results: Against ATCC 19977, apramycin activity exceeded that of amikacin, with maximum bacterial reductions between 1.51 and 2.18 log10 cfu/mL for the different doses. Apramycin 15 mg/kg q12h displayed slightly better killing compared with the other apramycin dosing regimens between 96 and 144h before regrowth occurred. NR-44261 was not inhibited by amikacin and the activity of apramycin against this isolate was similar between the three doses (∼0.5 log10 cfu/mL reductions). After 14 days of exposure to apramycin monotherapy, ATCC 19977 and NR-44261 became apramycin resistant with MICs of >32 mg/L.
Conclusions: Apramycin exhibited greater pharmacodynamic activity than amikacin against amikacin-susceptible M. abscessus isolates and may be a promising therapy for this pathogen. However, antibiotic combination strategies to minimize apramycin resistance from emerging may be necessary.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases