Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Mar 13:64:406-414.
doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42774.

Radiotherapy quality assurance in the PROTECT trial - a European randomised phase III-trial comparing proton and photon therapy in the treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Radiotherapy quality assurance in the PROTECT trial - a European randomised phase III-trial comparing proton and photon therapy in the treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer

Camilla Skinnerup Byskov et al. Acta Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To present results from the trial radiotherapy quality assurance (RTQA) programme of the centres involved in the randomised phase-III PROton versus photon Therapy for esophageal Cancer - a Trimodality strategy (PROTECT)-trial, investigating the clinical effect of proton therapy (PT) vs. photon therapy (XT) for patients with oesophageal cancer.

Materials and methods: The pre-trial RTQA programme consists of benchmark target and organ at risk (OAR) delineations as well as treatment planning cases, a facility questionnaire and beam output audits. Continuous on-trial RTQA with individual case review (ICR) of the first two patients and every fifth patient at each participating site is performed. Patient-specific QA is mandatory for all patients. On-site visits are scheduled after the inclusion of the first two patients at two associated PT and XT sites. Workshops are arranged annually for all PROTECT participants.

Results: Fifteen PT/XT sites are enrolled in the trial RTQA programme. Of these, eight PT/XT sites have completed the entire pre-trial RTQA programme. Three sites are actively including patients in the trial. On-trial ICR was performed for 22 patients. For the delineation of targets and OARs, six major and 11 minor variations were reported, and for six patients, there were no remarks. One major and four minor variations were reported for the treatment plans. Three site visits and two annual workshops were completed.

Interpretation: A comprehensive RTQA programme was implemented for the PROTECT phase III trial. All centres adhered to guidelines for pre-trial QA. For on-trial QA, major variations were primarily seen for target delineations (< 30%), and no treatment plans required re-optimisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The PROTECT RTQA programme consists of (1) Pre-trial QA, (2) On-trial QA, (3) Continuous plan monitoring in ePeerReview, (4) On-site visits and (5) Annual workshops for everyone involved in the trial RTQA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
On-site visits are performed when a site/two corresponding sites has included two patients for both PT and XT. A physician and a physicist from the RTQA group will discuss all parts of the treatment process with a radiation oncologist and a physicist and dosimetrist from the site to be audited. XT: Photon therapy; PT: proton therapy; RTQA: radiotherapy quality assurance.

References

    1. Eyck BM, Van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, van der Wilk BJ, Shapiro J, van Hagen P, et al. . Ten-year outcome of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer: the randomized controlled CROSS trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1995–2004. 10.1200/JCO.20.03614 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bosch DJ, Muijs CT, Mul VEM, Beukema JC, Hospers GAP, Burgerhof JGM, et al. . Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postoperative course after curative-intent transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:605–11. 10.1245/S10434-013-3316-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Routman DM, Garant A, Lester SC, Day CN, Harmsen WS, Sanheuza CT, et al. . A comparison of grade 4 lymphopenia with proton versus photon radiation therapy for esophageal cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019;4:63–9. 10.1016/J.ADRO.2018.09.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shiraishi Y, Fang P, Xu C, Song J, Krishnan S, Koay EJ, et al. . Severe lymphopenia during neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: a propensity matched analysis of the relative risk of proton versus photon-based radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018;128:154–60. 10.1016/J.RADONC.2017.11.028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang J, Wei C, Tucker SL, Myles B, Palmer M, Hofstetter WL, et al. . Predictors of postoperative complications after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86:885–91. 10.1016/J.IJROBP.2013.04.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources