Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 1;11(5):502-510.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0110.

Persistent Prostate-Specific Antigen Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer and Mortality Risk

Affiliations

Persistent Prostate-Specific Antigen Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer and Mortality Risk

Derya Tilki et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: Whether the conventional 1.5-month to 2.0-month time interval following radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PC) is sufficient to accurately document a persistent prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remains unanswered.

Objective: To evaluate the time necessary to accurately document a persistent PSA level after RP.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study evaluated whether a significant interaction existed between (1) a pre-RP PSA level greater than 20 ng/mL vs 20 ng/mL or less and (2) persistent PSA vs undetectable PSA after RP on PC-specific mortality (PCSM) risk and all-cause mortality (ACM) risk, adjusting for known PC prognostic factors, age at RP, year of RP, and the time-dependent use of post-RP radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Whether an increasing persistent PSA level was associated with a worse prognosis was also investigated. Patients with T1N0M0 to T3N0M0 PC treated with RP between 1992 and 2020 at 2 academic centers were included. Follow-up data were collected until November 2023. Data were analyzed from July 2024 to January 2025.

Exposure: RP.

Main outcomes and measures: Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of ACM and PCSM risk.

Results: Of 30 461 patients included in the discovery cohort, the median (IQR) age was 64 (59-68) years; of 12 837 patients included in the validation cohort, the median (IQR) age was 59 (54-64) years. Compared with patients with undetectable PSA, among patients with persistent PSA, a pre-RP PSA level greater than 20 ng/mL vs 20 ng/mL or less was significantly associated with reduced ACM risk (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91; P = .01; P for interaction < .001) and PCSM risk (aHR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.25-0.66; P < .001; P for interaction = .02). This result remained after adjustment for prostate volume and was confirmed in the validation cohort for PCSM risk and may represent a higher proportion of patients with a pre-RP PSA greater than 20 ng/mL vs 20 ng/mL or less who could have reached an undetectable PSA level if additional time for PSA assessment occurred before initiating post-RP therapy for presumed persistent PSA. Notably, there was more frequent and a shorter median time to post-RP RT plus ADT or ADT use in patients with a pre-RP PSA greater than 20 ng/mL (244 of 446 [54.7%] at a median [IQR] of 2.68 [1.51-4.40] months) vs 20 ng/mL or less (338 of 972 [34.8%] at a median [IQR] of 3.30 [2.00-5.39] months). These treatment times were shorter than the times to an undetectable PSA in observed patients (median [IQR] of 2.96 [1.84-3.29] months vs 3.37 [2.35-4.09] months, respectively). Increasing persistent PSA level was associated with an increased ACM risk (aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04-1.24; P = .004) and PCSM risk (aHR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12-1.45; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: PSA level assessed for at least 3 months after RP may minimize overtreatment, and in this study, a higher persistent PSA level was associated with a worse prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Tilki reported personal fees from Amgen, Apogepha, AstraZeneca, Astellas, A3P Biomedical, Bayer, Exact Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Veracyte, and Takeda outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CONSORT Diagram
To convert prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to μg/L, multiply by 1. PC indicates prostate cancer; RP, radical prostatectomy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Adjusted All-Cause Mortality (ACM) and Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality (PCSM) Estimates
A and B, Adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates of ACM and cumulative incidence estimates of PCSM for 30 461 patients. C and D, Adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates of ACM and cumulative incidence estimates of PCSM for 1418 patients with a post–radical prostatectomy (RP) persistent prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which was defined at time of first PSA assessment following RP. Estimates were adjusted for known prostate cancer prognostic factors, age at RP, year of RP, and the time-dependent use of post-RP radiation therapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy. To convert PSA to μg/L, multiply by 1. pPSA indicates persistent prostate-specific antigen; uPSA, undetectable prostate-specific antigen.

References

    1. Ploussard G, Fossati N, Wiegel T, et al. . Management of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4(2):150-169. doi:10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Preisser F, Chun FKH, Pompe RS, et al. . Persistent prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy and its impact on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol. 2019;76(1):106-114. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Penson DF. Follow-up surveillance after definitive local treatment for prostate cancer. Accessed August 12, 2023. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/follow-up-surveillance-after-definitiv...
    1. Brändle E, Hautmann O, Bachem M, et al. . Serum half-life time determination of free and total prostate-specific antigen following radical prostatectomy–a critical assessment. Urology. 1999;53(4):722-730. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00593-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hollander M, Wolfe D, Chicken E. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

Substances