Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 28:rapm-2024-106055.
doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-106055. Online ahead of print.

Non-neurodestructive ganglion impar blocks for coccydynia and related disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Non-neurodestructive ganglion impar blocks for coccydynia and related disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

David S Jevotovsky et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med. .

Abstract

Background/importance: Chronic coccydynia is a challenging condition to manage. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the role of the ganglion impar in coccygeal nociception. When conservative treatments fail, minimally invasive interventions at the ganglion impar may be effective in providing relief.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ganglion impar blocks (GIBs) for the management of chronic coccydynia.

Evidence review: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant studies were identified through a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase Classic+ Embase, CINAHL and the Web of Science in February 2024. Data on patient characteristics, intervention details, pain outcomes (measured by Visual Analog Scale and Numerical Pain Rating Scale) and adverse events were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) on scale of 0 to 10.

Findings: Seventeen studies described 625 coccydynia patients treated with GIB. All studies reported some level of improvement of pain after GIB. The meta-analysis included 11 studies totaling 391 patients with a baseline pain score of 7.93 (7.81 to 8.04 95% CI). GIBs were effective in reducing coccygeal pain at short-term (up to 3 months), intermediate-term (3-6 months) and long-term (greater than 6 months) follow-up. SMDs were -2.73 (95% CI -3.45 to -2.01), -2.13 (95% CI -2.82 to -1.45), -1.86 (95% CI -2.58 to -1.15) at 3 months, 3-6 months and >6 months, respectively. No serious adverse events were noted. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment indicated 'very low' certainty of evidence across all outcomes.

Conclusions: Non-neurodestructive GIB may be a safe and potentially effective treatment option for patients with chronic, refractory coccydynia.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024506056.

Keywords: Analgesia; Nerve Block; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pain Management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

LinkOut - more resources