Evaluation of empirical and mechanistic models and sampling intervals to model the lactation curves of F1 dairy sheep
- PMID: 40082283
- PMCID: PMC11906548
- DOI: 10.1007/s11250-025-04365-z
Evaluation of empirical and mechanistic models and sampling intervals to model the lactation curves of F1 dairy sheep
Abstract
Recently Latin American countries have developed a dairy sheep industry with an increasing number of specialized dairy-sheep flocks. The objective of this study was to evaluate the goodness of fit of empirical and mechanistic models and sampling interval to model the lactation curve of F1 dairy sheep with different shape of lactation curves in an intensively managed flock of the central highlands of Mexico. A total of 4,494 weekly (7D) test day records (TDR) from 156 lactations were analyzed. Three datasets were generated from the original 7D data set, setting TDR at different sampling intervals: 14 (14D), 21 (21D) and 28 (28D) days. Lactation curves were fitted using two empirical (Wood and Wilmink) and two mechanistic models (Dijkstra and Pollott). The parameters of the empirical and mechanistic models were estimated using the iterative non-linear curve fitting procedure in R. The results showed that the estimation of TMY was not affected by the sampling interval. However, the estimation of peak yield (PY) and day at peak yield (TPY) was affected by sampling interval (P < 0.05), with better estimates for 7D and 14D. Estimates of PY and TPY differed between the empirical and mechanistic models with both methods failing to estimate PY and TPY in atypical curves. The Dijkstra model showed the best fit for typical curves and the Pollott model for atypical curves in all the sampling intervals evaluated.
Keywords: Dairy ewe; Lactation curve; Mathematical modeling; Milk recording.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Statement of animal rights: The authors declare that production records were used, so the Statement of Animal Rights is not required. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Anderson SM, Mao IL, Gill JL (1989) Effect of frequency and spacing of sampling on accuracy and precision of estimating total lactation milk yield and characteristics of the lactation curve. J Dairy Sci 72(9):2387–2394. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79371-1 - DOI
-
- Angeles-Hernandez JC, Ortega OAC, Perez AHR, Ronquillo MG, Hernandez JCA, Ortega OAC, Perez AHR, Ronquillo MG (2014a) Effects of crossbreeding on milk production and composition in dairy sheep under organic management. Anim Prod Sci 54:1641–1645. 10.1071/AN14214 - DOI
-
- Angeles-Hernandez JC, Ortega OC, Portillo BA, Montaldo HH, Ronquillo MG (2014b) Application of the Wood model to analyse lactation curves of organic dairy sheep farming. Anim Prod Sci 54(10):1609. 10.1071/AN14272 - DOI
-
- Angeles-Hernandez JC, Pollott G, Albarran-Portillo B, Ramírez-Perez AH, Lizarazo-Chaparro A, Castelan Ortega OA, Gonzalez Ronquillo M (2018) The application of a mechanistic model to analyze the factors that affect the lactation curve parameters of dairy sheep in Mexico. Small Ruminant Res 164:58–63. 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.05.003 - DOI
-
- Angeles-Hernandez JC, Schilling SR, Arias MAV, Pérez RAE, Castelán-Ortega OA, Pérez AHR, Ronquillo MG (2018) Effect of live weight pre- and post-lambing on milk production of East Friesian sheep. Ital J Anim Sci 17(1):184–194. 10.1080/1828051X.2017.1349536 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
